• bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        14 days ago

        Ocean ships sail to Duluth MN all the time so any state with shoreline on the great lakes has a direct route to the ocean.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      It feels wrong, but landlocked typically refers to coastline on the ocean.

      If you use navigability to the ocean, then the states on the Mississippi River also aren’t landlocked.

      There isn’t a word for “c’mon, the great lakes have proper freighters and a coast guard presence. Michigan is obviously not landlocked”.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 days ago

        Not just the Mississippi. The US happens to have the most miles of navigable rivers and coastlines, as well as the most natural deep bays, of any country in the world.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      If any water counts, then almost everywhere that people live at all has “water access”. Lakes, however big, aren’t the ocean.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        Landlocked usually refers to navigation not access to water. For that purpose the Great Lakes count.

        • nexguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          You can take a boat from Nebraska to the ocean via river so it’s not land locked either.

        • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Then so do the North Saskatchewan, South Saskatchewan, and Saskatchewan rivers. There’s cities on those rivers today because back in the day it was easy access between them.

          • Hawke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            You’ll find no argument from me. If you can get from there to the ocean with a sufficiently large vessel, I’d say it’s not landlocked.

            The state/province borders are pretty arbitrary themselves, there’s a lot of nuance lost in this simplified infographic.

            • _core@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              Going by that then the states on the great lakes aren’t landlocked either since you can get to the ocean from them

              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                Yeah, a good deal of early US/Canadian history revolved around who had access to which waterways that could get to the ocean, who built canals from where to where, etc.

                Like, lakes and rivers are still generally fresh water, not salt water… but they have always been used as basically logistics highways, by basically all peoples, everywhere, forever, before the advent of planes trains and automobiles… and a pretty huge amount of freight still does get moved around on thr Great Lakes… though of course recent tariffs are probably greatly complicating and lessening that.

                https://greatlakes-seaway.com/en/navigating-the-seaway/seaway-map/

                • _core@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  This a cool pic of the profile of the Great Lakes System of locks and the elevation changes. It’s an amazing set of engineering over the last couple hundred years that’s still being upgraded and expanded.

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        It’s crazy how much money we spend on zero-point energy generation just to teleport container ships from the Great Lakes to the Atlantic.

        • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Oh so you’d prefer we just send the ships over Niagara Falls instead? Silly NZPTIMBY folks (No Zero-Point Teleportation In My Back Yard) 😛

      • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        I live in northern Ohio and I don’t feel very landlocked when I look out at Lake Erie haha. I imagine Michiganders feel that but I’m three sides of the state

        • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Uh-huh. I see you over there posting from a lemmy.ca account on the north shore, Canadian.

          Ok well actually I don’t, the lake is too big and extends to the horizon…

          • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            Haha, I’m close enough, but not quite a Canadian. This is a good instance, they aren’t going anywhere like those .ml people

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      south of most of the great lakes doesn’t seem to count… oh I see now. The great beaches of Hudson Bay count as ocean access, no matter how little ships or beachgoers there are.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Well that’s true of nearly anywhere next to a lake or river, right? I think we’d count Manaus in Brazil or Kazan in Russia as being landlocked despite being next to large navigable rivers that go to the ocean

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        Different definitions of the word “landlocked” have different meanings. There’s one sense that’s more relating to logistics, where a country/state/whatever is landlocked if it doesn’t have something that functions like a port, not just a dock, or could if desired.
        In that sense, Chicago is not landlocked because they have a port that can receive freight. Other places on the great lakes could although they might not due to whatever reason.

        The other definition has more to do with controlling access to oceanic waters. Chicagos access to the ocean is at the mercy of Canada and all the states that control the st Lawrence seaway.

        So if you’re discussing economics you care that Bolivia can get freight shipping. If you’re discussing geopolitics you care that Bolivia needs to form agreements with other countries to ensure that access remains uninterrupted.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I remembered my geography wrong

          It does go to the Black Sea, which then goes on to the Turkish Straits, the Mediterranean, the Strait of Gibraltar, and then the ocean though. I think if Chicago counts then Kazan has to

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      I guess, but the great lakes are connected to the ocean via the st Lawrence seaway

      • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        They are connected via a seaway that is controlled by other political entities.

        Holy fuck this is the dumbest comment section in the history of Lemmy. “Nebraska isn’t landlocked because it has a river.”

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          They are connected via a seaway that is controlled by other political entities.

          By that definition, Gaza is landlocked

          • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            It effectively is, yes. It shouldn’t be, but in practice it does not control its access to the open sea. Its sea “access” is basically limited to near-shore fishing.

  • Linktank@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 days ago

    This isn’t taking altitude into account at all. When the ocean starts coming to you, you don’t want to be in Nebraska.

    • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      The mean elevation of the state is 2600 feet above sea level. The point of lowest elevation in the state is still 840 feet above sea level. According to National Geographic and the USGS, if all of the ice in the world melted, the rise in sea level would be approximately 215-230 feet. While, obviously, the second and third order effects are a different kettle of fish, from a submergence standpoint, Nebraska will be just fine.

  • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    This map is the entire burden of proof I need to declare we should kick Pennsylvania out of the east coast and relegate it to a flyover

    • porksnort@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I used to go hang out at the docks at the Port of Lewiston and listen to the longshorepersons tell tales of maritime sodomy. Then I would eat a large potato.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      IIRC from a Stand-Up Maths video from a while back, there are no countries that are triple-land-locked. Which is why he looked at US states.

        • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          I think he gave a reason for only taking the time to look at US states (may have just been time) Matt Parker of Stand-Up Maths is from the UK, and I’m sure he’s aware that other countries have states.

  • Talaraine@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    You know what state used to be the bottom of the ocean? Nebraska. I think the state hates the ocean too xD

  • Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Wisconsin is definitely not double landlocked, direct access to the oceans via the Mississippi River and through the Great Lakes.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah but then Nebraska has access to the ocean via river too

      How’s about we just take it as “ocean coastline” and leave it at that