To cherry pick it and use it to promote fascist views
Averages. They’re almost always a bullshit flag if it’s tied to anything remotely political. If you’re not going to also give the standard deviation and skew then at least use median.
Probably to support racism. Like the black people crime statistics.
Yeah. Eugenics. It’s convinced a lot of smart people.
White people are shot more by cops proving there is no police brutality against people of color.
(No, this isn’t my actual opinion. This is an arguement racists use and white suprimists)
…as a drunken man uses lamp posts — for support rather than illumination.
The question makes me remember Daryl Bem, a celebrated social psychologist. He published a much cited article called “Writing the Empirical Journal Article”. About 15 years ago, he used this advice to prove that humans can see into the future. His advice is probably still used to teach. That’s probably the worst thing you can do.
deleted by creator
When you mix statistics with marketing.
Not making sure the result even makes sense. There was a real example, where a ~2010 news article said that the number of crimes in their city has been doubling every year since ~1980.
That is not possible. Assume that there was one crime in 1980. In 2010, there must be at least 2^20 crimes.
Eugenics
Well, to immanetize the eschaton. That’s the worst thing to do with statistics.
By using unrelated data to prove a point.
Or misrepresenting data.
For example, if your country has a 10% crime rate. Meaning 10% of the population will commit a crime at some point. Due to worker immigration the country gains 20% more people. The it is expected that of those workers about 10% will commit a crime. Thus increasing the total amount of crimes committed in the country but the crime rate is still at 10%.
Now misrepresenting would be to cry out that the workers are bad because the amount of crime has gone up.
Blindly. People love to list them as evidence as if the numbers stand on their own. Reality is a person had some hand in assembling the numbers and there is no such thing as a bulletproof statistic. Good statistics ought to be scrutinized.
As a math guy, I hate when people say statistics is math. Like yeah, there are equations, and math plays a role, but the results so often speak more to the selection and interpretation choices made by the statistician than to any kind of mathematical rigor.
96.3 % of all statistics are misleading.
87.7% of statistics are made up on the spot.
99.7% of general questions about statistics have this same joke at least once in the replies
100% I’m gay
Bonus points for three standard deviations
correlation and causation. even useless stats comparing apples and oranges, the numbers generated are only as good as the study design and methods.
More men are arrested for crime than women, proving that cops are sexist.
