Is it weird? Is it rude? Should threads be archived?

  • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Perfectly fine. Bumps don’t do what they used to do in messageboard/BBS contexts, so if you have something useful/clever/funny to say in a dead thread I say go for it.

    Heck, sometimes it can prompt a follow-up when someone says “You know, I should do [x related to topic]” after some time has passed, which is fun.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The wording had initially confused me.

        I thought this was about posts that got no comments, not about necro’ing posts.

        Honestly, I think necro’ing posts is really only a problem when your forum software doesn’t have many options for sorting the feed. Lemmy is more advanced; if you don’t like necro’d posts, then just don’t sort by recent activity.

  • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I come across a post and I have something significant enough to comment, I leave it regardless of age. But I don’t think I’m ever going to see anything more than a few days old with how I browse.

  • Sabata@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have had threads on reddit that were well over 5 years old get comments. I’m not upset, but I am questioning how you ended up so deep in the past + what the hell past me was thinking.

  • Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t understand why people would find it rude/incorrect

    • droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      God knows there aren’t many new threads on lemmy so I’ve been searching random keywords looking for interesting old threads to read and sometimes comment on.

      • minibyte@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        Quite a few of us sort by “New Comments”. Posting to an old thread can help breathe new life into it, especially if you have something new to add to the conversation.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I acknowledge it. I preface my post with something, usually /rezz or I’ll comment “I know this is old but…”

    • run@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      this was how it worked on forums back in the day, no? i see it as a revival of a good thing

  • Ludrol@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    I love notifications about replies to the old stuff as it means that the internet has slowed down and new and shining isn’t as appealing as old stuff.

    • droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      I do too! I mean notifications of replies are always a shot of dopamine no matter how old.

      That reminds me there’s this dude who replied to a pic I posted with “Can use this as an album cover?” I said sure and he said “Cool see me in a year”. I replied a year later “How’s that album coming along?” and was like “give me another year” lol. It’s almost been two years now. Gonna check in again soon.

  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Depends on the type of community, forums it’s potentially disruptive since it bumps it to the top. Redsit/Lemmy style it matters less.

    I certainly would advocate against archiving Lemmy posts in a way that “locks” them, I can’t tell you how many times an old reddit post shows up in a search result and helpful newer replies with the most recent information is still getting added sporadically.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s a holdover from old BBS forum style.

      When you reply to an ancient thread, it immediately gets pushed to the top of the board. Now everyone basically is wondering what this 5 year old topic is doing on the first page. And they might have to read through several pages of messages to understand what the hell the newest reply is about because nobody remembers the topic in the first place.

      With Reddit/Lemmy, the upvote system means it really doesn’t matter at all if you reply to an ancient thread, it won’t jump to the front page for anyone.

    • droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Me neither, but someone commented here it’s a holdover from the days of forums where a new reply to an old thread would instantly put that thread at the top of the forums because the order was always latest reply. This was found annoying by some people especially if the new reply was short and meaningless or something. Makes more sense to me now.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It is a holdover from the old forum days when adding a comment would pop a thread to the top of the front page, so someone going through and commenting on multiple old posts would flood the front page with outdated discussions. Generally those people would also post worthless comments, like ‘Thanks’, that didn’t add anything.

    Now that we have more ways to sort the underlying problem is no longer relevant, but some people still hold on to that mindset. Some people who weren’t around for the older forums may have caught the disdain from others, or could even just have it in their minds that discussions always have limited time frames for whatever reason.

    I don’t care unless someone relies to my comment to continue some stupid argument they started four months ago.

    • droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh I didn’t know that! I didn’t grow up on forums but I used them a few times here and there. You’re right new replies do push a thread to the top. Kind of a bad design lol.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        It was a great design when the intent was to make new discussion visible. It was great for reviving threads when new and prodictive discussion was added!

        Like any design, there will be cases where it doesn’t work as intended. It is hard to design around people adding non-productive comments.

        • droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Fair point

          There’s only one forum I visit nowadays and it gets older threads revived every now and then. Usually to say “Whatever happened to that? Is it done yet?”

  • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it’s a question that has no answer (or no useful answer) it’s totally fine to comment with an answer.

    I figure that someone will eventually stumble across the same thread that I did if they have a similar question. Might as well contribute and share some knowledge.

    Relevant xkcd:

    • octobob@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      My favorite was a specific problem I had modding Morrowind on Linux years ago and posting to reddit.

      Only for years to pass and I search for the same problem, only to find my own damn post with no replies.

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    I get comments on months old posts, I’m fine with it since it will help future users

    If the person is looking for a discussion (ex. They need help with the software I posted about), then it’s usually better they make a new post