• Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    The current PM where I work:

    • cannot figure out audio settings for teams
    • cannot understand microphone feedback loops
    • cannot ask you your status on a task without giving just enough time for you to think it’s your turn to speak only to then start speaking again the moment you start explaining your status
    • cannot understand that an explanation for the status of a task can apply to multiple similar tasks
    • always second guesses decisions

    Their only actual job as far as I can tell is to tell the suits what they want to hear in their fucked up little business language. But I haven’t seen that, so maybe they’re terrible at that as well.

    It feels like they memorized and religiously practice the CIA’s handbook for field sabotage.

  • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Man, gotta disagree here. There are deadweights under every job title. Had a pm that literally carried the team on her back, while simultaneously shielding us from bullshit from on high.

    • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Unfortunately, you’re right about as much as the original meme is. At my current gig, I’ve worked with half a dozen PMs, and while the majority of them were (seemingly) sweet and nice people, at least half of them would struggle to pour piss out of a boot if you wrote instructions on the heel. Even with project templates and runbooks, we still regularly had to clean up after them because they didn’t do part of the project or expected us to work on stuff that wasn’t marked as being live yet.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Acceptable ones aren’t too rare, that is, ones that don’t have negative productivity – depending on the industry and company politics, in some places it’s BS all the way down. Good ones are rare and stellar ones are unicorns as it’s a dual mastery thing: You have to be good at both the technical aspects, as well as the people aspect, and neither of those two can be mere talent, it needs to be talent and education. Judging by Alice Cecile, being a systems ecologist is the right overall qualification.

    • WhiteRabbit_33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There are definitely some amazing PMs, but I’ve met way more terrible PMs who don’t know shit about fuck and don’t care to learn than good PMs.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    project managers (or any types of managers) who are forces of nature can really drive things forward. this person talks about the useless kind of manager which often tries to interject him/her self in everything slowing things down. They act like this mostly because otherwise they would be useless as that is their only skill and they got the position through mix of luck and network.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    A good project manager is worth their weight in gold. Large scale projects are complex and have lots of moving parts. Someone who understands this and is good at keeping all the “parts” moving while heading off any potential issues is extremely valuable.

    The problem is that often the people doing the hiring don’t know what it takes to run a large project, much less what good project management looks like. They just hire some idiot with an agile certification whose only skill is moving items around a kanban board in a way that gives the illusion that progress is being made.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I would add to that: A lot of a good project manager’s job is shielding the team from bullshit from above.

      You can push back on people randomly deciding that changes need to be made to the project, push back on requests for mandatory overtime or whatever, fight to expand the team when it needs to be expanded, intervene when someone “high up” is trying to single out some person on the team for blame, and so on and so forth. Even on projects where a lot of the organization can be done by the team itself (which is a lot of them), there’s a vital role just in having an advocate for the team present in “management.”

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Agreed. I was involved in a project that lasted several years and the project manager was great at filtering out the bullshit and politics so it doesn’t go down to my level. They were also great as an interface between teams so I wouldn’t need to directly deal with people who are difficult to work with. I wish she was the project manager on the other projects I’m involved in right now.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Another problem is when management somehow manages to make a simple project into a crazy complex project.

      I see two drivers of this: General empire building, more headcount under me == I am more important

      Trying to use unvetted, low quality labor to do something being their abilities and trying to make it up with volume because corporate leadership declared it should be possible and anyone who says otherwise it’s a bad fit for the company.

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Dear God… I tried to think of some more from my time in that world, and all I could come up with was “when the rubber meets the road.”

          There must be more, but I have forgotten. Is it finally wearing off? I’m free now, after so many years? I can just be happy?

          • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’m absolutely thrilled on your behalf to hear you’ve successfully sunsetted that legacy temporal paradigm—those kinds of linguistic feedback loops can really create mindshare bottlenecks, leading to suboptimal ideation and a lack of disruptive communication innovation. At the end of the day, it’s about leaning into agile thought leadership, pivoting away from antiquated verbiage, and unlocking next-gen linguistic bandwidth to drive scalable, high-impact dialogue. Remember: It’s not just about thinking outside the box—it’s about disrupting the box, burning the box, and monetizing the ashes for maximum stakeholder engagement!

            • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              42 minutes ago

              Your clear grasp on the language as a SME goes a long way towards breaking down the silos within our resources. We’ll need to set a strong cadence in order to drive these new workflows from storming to norming. I’ll set a friendly follow-up to make sure your progress doesn’t get yellow-lighted in this week’s board review. I really appreciate your time on this task. Keep up the good work! Best, Robot.

              Edit: Looks like I can give everyone 5 minutes of their day back!

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 hours ago

    A good PM will herd all the cats and attend all the meetings you don’t want to. They’re worth their weight in gold.

    A bad PM will do none of the above and constantly drag you in to fight their fires. They’re worth their weight in, well, you know.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Note I’ve seen the “protecting me from a meeting” backfire so hard.

      One time for lack of headcount I did a bit of double duty as project manager including executive meetings. Then management found a project manager and instead of knocking out my part of those meetings in like 5 minutes, I suddenly had generally hour long prep meetings so my new project manager would be confident enough to engage in whatever random topic the execs tended to go into. After a quarter they demanded I swap back in to do the meetings instead, which I was happy to do.

      Also, those meetings are my best chance to cut through some confusion so I don’t end up with a mess of crap in the tracker.

      • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        As a PM who tries to not waste anyone’s time, thank you. I’ve had pushback before from people who don’t like to do the talking, but I would only call that person forward if it’s going to prevent a ton of headaches all around. Sometimes it’s difficult to explain that. Otherwise I have no problem being the punching bag on stage. It’s my job.

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You say that until the first time you join a team with multiple projects to accomplish and zero project or program management. It sucks. Badly.

    I pine for very excellent PMs I’ve known.

    I had a manager once with a powerful knack for hiring great ones. The only problem was that each and every one of them got poached for upper management in the business.