Reading the article helps to answer this question:
The DOJ is asking the court to force Google to promptly and fully divest itself of Chrome, along with any data or other assets required for its continued operation.
It also links the filing, see specifically “III. Plaintiffs’ Revised Proposed Final Judgment”
The fundamental issue is that he’s looking for someone to provide a free service instead of for someone to provide free software.
The latter happens so much more often because it doesn’t create ongoing costs for the developer.
El Capitan 😁