• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Google says government proposals would “harm America’s consumers.”

    Says the company that couldn’t stand by the core value “don’t be evil”.

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      Musk will be champing at the bit to own a controlling share of both of these. It disgusts me to agree with them but they’re right. This is the single worst possible time to try and push this through.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        This is the single worst possible time to try and push this through.

        Which is why it’s happening now, I agree.

        But we, the non-billionaires are still better off after any monopoly split. It’s hard to express how incredibly bad powerful monopolies are. The fact that another billionaire will be the buyer sucks, but it’s no reason to back away from forcing the legally required split.

  • Walican132@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    Interesting. Why focus on selling chrome? I’m not sure I understand the DOJ here. Google could end Chrome and continue updating chromium instead of selling if not for this directive. Given they are approved to continue working on chromium I don’t see why the sale is being forced.

  • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The DOJ is asking the court to force Google to promptly and fully divest itself of Chrome, along with any data or other assets required for its continued operation. It is essentially aiming to take the Chrome user base—consisting of some 3.4 billion people—away from Google and hand it to a competitor

    Fuck yes, shatter that shit.

      • radix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Seriously. The only people willing to pay what it’s “worth” will end up doing the same thing (or worse).

        What we need are some actual privacy laws with teeth, so that the data isn’t worth as much to begin with.

      • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Elon’s a dunce, so he’ll probably enshittify it so badly that people will leave. So google is weakened and chrome dies (at least, i hope in a good outcome)

        • NightOwl@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That regular people would stop using chrome if it turned into xhrome is highly unlikely. These are people who browse without adblocker, use facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, and buy Amazon echos. It’d just lead to Doge influencing the direction of xhromium based browsers.

          • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            True :( but we’ve seen how stupid he is, and now bluesky has become xitter’s #1 competitor because of his incompetence. Maybe, maybe, maybe…

      • NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If that happened which would not surprise me with how ridiculous US government has been I’d be open to using Samsung’s Tizen over Doge controlled and influenced Xdroid.

  • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Google is awful, but any other company that could afford to buy and run Chrome would be worse.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          Preferring that we enforce our laws regardless of which billionaire benefits is a vote for Trump? I didn’t realize that. I’ve seen the light now. Thank you.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          41 minutes ago

          We can’t continue selectively enforcing our laws against monopolies. (This is just dark humor. Citizens United is for the express purpose of ensuring that any anti-monopoly law enforcement we get is selective and political, for the rest of however long the US has left.)

        • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think what they were saying is: two powerful, competing corpos is better than one huge and practically omnipotent corporation, which is what google currently is.

          • NightOwl@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Under normal circumstances, but i just have this suspicion that Musk will buy it using Russian and Saudi funding like was rumored for where he got the funding for Twitter.

            So whether that would be a better situation I guess is up to interpretation.

      • NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Non profit under this US administration who’s mantra is what rules? Seems highly optimistic. I see it being more likely that Musk takes the opportunity to try and get the most popular browser and phone OS that is used world wide.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          100% guaranteed Musk is going to try and wrangle a controlling share of Android. Probably Chrome too but definitely Android. He desperately wants to be in your pockets snooping on your text messages and harvesting your contact data.

          • NightOwl@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            35 minutes ago

            Yeah seeing how elated he is being an absolute asshole with starlink he must be bursting with joy at the thought of chrome and android in his possession too.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If they really wanted to change the character of the company, spin off the ad and cloud businesses into two separate things and let them figure out the rest.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They’ll bend eventually. Money does that.

      Remember when DeSantis went to war with Disney? And Disney destroyed him and any chance he had to being a presidential candidate and we all cheered? Then Disney went around to make allegiance with all the non-DeSantis Republicans?

      It’s all money for stockholders at the end of the day. Not people, not who sits at the throne.