• novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Am I alone and being firmly against upscaling, never tried it, and everything is played or native resolution only? There have been games that only used 20% of GPU so I doubled game reaultion, but never upscaling.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m sure you’re not alone but can I ask why? Some games use it better than others, and the tech has come a long way. If I have to choose between native 4k and 40fps, or 80 or even more fps with tiny artifacts that I only really notice when I’m actively pixel peeping… I mean, I’ll take the latter, personally.

      • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        But with those options, your latency is still equivalent to 40fps so it won’t feel any snappier and now you’re introducing artifacts so the image quality is worse. I get upscaling. I don’t get why anyone would ever enable frame gen.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Neither I or the person I was replying to were talking about frame gen.

          As for the latency, not in a way that I notice. I’d rather play 80 or more fps upscaled with minute artifacts that I don’t notice, than 40 fps native 4k, just as I said. It feels much better to me, even if it’s placebo.