I’m sure you’re not alone but can I ask why? Some games use it better than others, and the tech has come a long way. If I have to choose between native 4k and 40fps, or 80 or even more fps with tiny artifacts that I only really notice when I’m actively pixel peeping… I mean, I’ll take the latter, personally.
But with those options, your latency is still equivalent to 40fps so it won’t feel any snappier and now you’re introducing artifacts so the image quality is worse. I get upscaling. I don’t get why anyone would ever enable frame gen.
Neither I or the person I was replying to were talking about frame gen.
As for the latency, not in a way that I notice. I’d rather play 80 or more fps upscaled with minute artifacts that I don’t notice, than 40 fps native 4k, just as I said. It feels much better to me, even if it’s placebo.
I’m sure you’re not alone but can I ask why? Some games use it better than others, and the tech has come a long way. If I have to choose between native 4k and 40fps, or 80 or even more fps with tiny artifacts that I only really notice when I’m actively pixel peeping… I mean, I’ll take the latter, personally.
But with those options, your latency is still equivalent to 40fps so it won’t feel any snappier and now you’re introducing artifacts so the image quality is worse. I get upscaling. I don’t get why anyone would ever enable frame gen.
Neither I or the person I was replying to were talking about frame gen.
As for the latency, not in a way that I notice. I’d rather play 80 or more fps upscaled with minute artifacts that I don’t notice, than 40 fps native 4k, just as I said. It feels much better to me, even if it’s placebo.