• gaael@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Pleasedo, maybe this way the wine lobby in france is gonna have a bit less money and we’ll get some less pesticides.

    • GoatTnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would hit plenty of us working class schmucks too. I don’t usually get to treat myself to a bottle, but it’s nice for a special occasion to get actual champagne over prosecco. I guess this is the end of that.

            • GoatTnder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Transport from France to Germany is a lot cheaper than from France to USA. But I don’t know why Italian prosecco is so much cheaper. Same issue with bordeaux vs. (say) tuscan.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        California produces many excellent sparkling wines, some of which are quite affordable. We’ve got a bit of a grape glut as well, so that should help with prices. European wines going to Canada sounds like a good plan as well! I’m all for anything that pries the big-money donors away from Trump but I hope this is one that won’t hurt ordinary folks too much.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t make Champagne in the USA, one thing us Europeans won’t stand for is calling a food something if it wasn’t made in the right region. Brought to by Big Hallomi

    • Zzyzx@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, I’m going to guess that if this administration wants to do something, then international laws about place of origin don’t matter anymore either.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Excellent then… if USA won’t respect intl rules, I would finally be able to open my Spider-man vs Darth Vader themed cafe and pay nothing to Disney for it

      • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        The EU is doing something infinitely better than placing tariffs on random goods, a strategy already used when that orange turd was US president the last time. They are very specifically targeting products of US states that voted for him and his party where the impact on the EU economy is minimal.

        No surprise he is foaming at the mouth over that, I guess those in his inner circle who do have more brains than him (Is it true that all orange presidents have to share the single brain cell with all the orange cats, by the way?) did already complain about the bad EU ruining their business.

        • FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I didn’t know we do that. Only heard that Canada does it. I’m curious how this will affect groceries. Couldn’t think of much, because Europe is pretty self-sustaining with 95% of goods.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            We have a protein crop shortfall, most of it goes to animal fodder and is South American soy, the rest is Canadian lentils.

            But yes impact in Europe will be minimal, both when it comes to our tariffs because minimising impact is built into them and, apparently, also when it comes to theirs, because Trump doesn’t give a fuck about applying tariffs strategically. The rest of the world will be more than happy to buy our alcohol, maybe at slightly lower prices but it’s not like it’s hard to sell.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Putting tariffs on luxury goods that most of us can’t afford is probably the least bad thing Trump’s done so far.

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let’s remind everyone that Trump doesn’t drink alcohol, doesn’t smoke and eats his steak rare covered in ketchup.

      • biofaust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Did he say he only eats at McD? I must say that, for as long as I visited the US, their steaks, cooked medium-rare, where the main reason to endure the travel and the people there.

        • NotLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Too bad you’re adding to the plastic in your brain with every meat consumption. Idk about ‘only’ but he looks like he’s made of McD trash and he eats it everyday apparently.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Orange Shittler says “it’s time to buy US champagne” like the fucking sundowning syphilitc he is. There is no such thing as US champagne. Champagne only comes from the Champagne region of France.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Loooool have fun with your shitty wine. Besides you can’t even have your own champagne as it’s location trademarked.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      European wine is no better than American and I say that with a complete lack of national pride lol

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a pretty outdated view that US wine (primarily from California, Oregon, Washington) is of lesser quality of that of Europe. True, the big flagship wines -the first growth Bordeaux and premier cru Burgundy and Champagne, are rarely matched. But a large majority of American wine is on par with most European wine.

      Now, of course I do not support tariffs on US imports of wine. But pushing back on the quality comment.

        • veroxii@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s only not allowed because the USA enforces that policy. Trump can decide tomorrow that USA sparkling wine can be called Champagne when sold in the USA and there’s nothing France can do about it.

          The orange clown has shown us the rules are only any good if there’s someone who can enforce them. Most of them are just gentlemen’s agreements.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ll grant you that good champagne is better than great domestic sparkling.

          But “no matter how good it is?” I don’t care what something is called; there is good domestic sparkling, and there is bad champagne. I’d rather drink the “good “” without the label.

          Interesting aside. Because the senate never recognized the article in The Treaty of Versailles that prohibited use of Champagne, there are producers on the US grandfathered into being able to, technically, use the term.

    • Paul Drye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You probably should not be surprised to learn that the US does not entirely recognize the appellation. If the wine was marketed as “Champagne” prior to 2006, they may use the name in the United States.

  • Brumefey@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    For whatever tariff he adds, we should compensate by a long term « positive » deal with our Canada ally.