Processed food companies are fucking criminals

The study found that participants who were in the top fifth of consumers of UPFs—eating nine or more servings per day—had a 50% higher risk of developing depression than those in the bottom fifth of consumers, eating four or fewer servings per day.

The researchers also identified a link between artificial sweeteners and depression: Participants in the top fifth of consumers had a 26% higher risk of developing depression than those in the bottom fifth.

https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/ultra-processed-foods-may-increase-risk-of-depression/

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    OK so two things.

    1. They say “may” because it is not definitive that there is a causal link. It could just as easily be (and frankly, likely might be) a reverse cause where growing depression makes you less inclined to worry about purchasing and preparing whole foods yourself, or that the link might be correlated to another cause like financial troubles which cause both depression and more cheap and convenient food choices. Maybe the food does cause depression but that is not yet conclusive.

    2. “Processed food companies are fucking criminals” so… there’s a lot to unpack here. Are you suggesting that they KNOW it causes depression and make it anyway? Or even that they intentionally make it cause depression? Because there is absolutely no reason to think that, if it even provably did. They’re guilty of contributing to the general unhealthy dietary habits and all the other ethical problems that come with a profits over people business model that applies to nearly every capitalist business. But that doesnt seem to be the source of your comment.

    This is valuable research and is a step towards understanding how food and mental health may be connected. But you are jumping to all sorts of conclusions, my guy.

  • KitB@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Does this study account for the obvious: poor people eat more UPFs and are more depressed?

    • Luswa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Does this study account for the obvious: poor people eat more UPFs and are more depressed?

      Yes

      The authors of the study accounted for income disparities:

      with adjustment for known and suspected risk factors for depression, including age, total caloric intake, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), physical activity, smoking status, menopausal hormone therapy, total energy intake, alcohol, comorbidities (eg, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia), median family income, social network levels, marital status, sleep duration, and pain.

      https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2809727

  • hayvan@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Repeat after me: correlation does not imply causation.

    (This doesn’t mean UPFs are good for you)

  • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nonsense. The first question should be some version of why are you here. Not everyone goes to therapy for depression.