Self hosting is often gold, yeah.

On the flipside, we are who we are; what we are is immovable from anyone but ourselves.

The realisation itself is also liberation.

Also little actual greenery. I couldn’t call these gardens. At best they’re sad grass fields.

Harsh no, give me liberty.

Safety must necessitate a non-authoritarian society.

I dunno, religion is funny to me

In other words, Reaganomics contributed to Islamic terrorism.

Or, to make it clickbaity-ish, “caused”.

For Amazon the best replacement would be Bol.com if you’re in the Benelux. If not, shop locally (except for malls).

chav, unfortunately

Embrace, Extend, Extinguish, but only for bigger cooperations.

As in, extinguish them. Make it far more attractive to not be at a big soulless corpo.

Not necessarily. It mainly appears safer because there’s less knife violence.

Both are terrible.

The ideal “capitalism” is an economy without money or centralised planning. Where people give based on need, not on production.

Except that Switzerland has a strong regulation on weapons too. Unlike the US.

Even Hitler’s own very Sturmabteilung didn’t hide their faces. Fuckin’ cowards.

Some people don’t realise it immediately, though. What would you say for that one?

Good move of Nepal to ban Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Whatsapp, VK, WeChat, Threads, as well as Facebook, LinkedIn, Facebook Messenger, Pinterest, and Discord.

That said, Mastodon and Signal also being included, is dumb. What Nepal could do better, is that upon visiting one of the banned sites, users are advised to download another, decentralised medium.

Alleen maar goed. Rechtse media komen niet voor Henk en Ingrid op. Integendeel, ze zijn tégen hun belang. Ze zijn niet eens van hun eigen groep.

Een van de groepen die van de groep Henk en Ingrid deel uitmaakt, die wel voor hun belangen opkomt… dat zijn de SP, de Jacobin, enzovoorts.

Suspecting that the US got a backdoor and is spying for the UK.

Also i) PFAS and teflon.

Title correction: recovery of ozone layer makes planet safer against cancer.

The warming due to the ozone layer’s recovery is a smaller problem than cancer, and cancer is a smaller problem than global warming due to emissions. (Because the emissions themselves increase cancer risks).

The ozone layer, if it never was harmed by mankind in the first place, would’ve helped us. Because it blocks UV light to an extent, and UV light causes damage to cells, including those of plants (which have a cooling effect due to taking up moisture from the air).

So, what you’re saying, is that one would have to use an e-sim rather than physical sim? To avoid a zero-day exploit? I find that hard to believe.