

I looked at an article of his from 2019 (so no chatGPT) and it’s pretty bad; this guy seems to really love commas: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimosman/2019/05/08/unicorn-myth-uber-wework-dotcom-bubble/
Though it really looks like he just fed a bunch of his articles to ChatGPT and is slowly making it less and less coherent because he’s just copy/pasting all his articles from the same chat. Also I think b/c he’s a contributor he wouldn’t have an editor since he’s a not a staff writer?
IDK Forbes was a massive slop mill that anyone with a pulse could send in articles to for a good while, he probably was able to stick around b/c of the business focus.
It’s creating a situation where someone could continue to lie and have sex under false pretenses (which would be SA), but I wouldn’t equate it to that itself.
Scummy to do but I’d guess it’d be about as successful as someone who just messages everyone they match with, keeps the conversation general and asks to meet up relatively promptly, because that’s what this bot is most likely doing.
Also on the flip side of being decieved by this it may just mean there are a few people curious about the kind of person who would try to automate dating or who want to have sex enough that they don’t care if they like their date on a personal level.