

I agree with you and I think the party is the key for enabling and perpetuating this capitulation.
Look at how they have always been the more media savvy party, look at the career track of the Obama’s post presidency.
It’s not that we need to by cynical and assume that we can never trust a leadership, we simply cannot ever trust this party. We must build a party whose job is not only to cultivate and promote political talent, but also to hold them accountable to an ideological program. As much as I am dissapointed witb AOC and expecting to be dissapointed with Zohran. We were always foolish to assume or expect anyone could make a push upward with the load stone of the Democratic Party dragging them down. People cannot be an island and especially if they are expected to fight political conflicts along class lines.
This is not to excuse their actions but to understand why they capitulate. Again, not to be cynical, but people often are self interested and waging class war is fucking dangerous, no matter what the terrain is, soft or hard.
When the party presents every incentive to capitulate then eventually people fold because the stakes are very very high and pressure gets to everyone eventually. When you are backed by an organized party with an ideological line, it can steels one’s resolve and help keep everyone honest.
Sure mayor Pete, but the posture must be one that prioritizes antagonism over collaboration.
I would posit it is better to advocate positions that are radical and populist enough as to demonstrate the inefficacy and malice of the party when they completely stymie any attempt to enact these policies and even reach across the aisle to do so. Omar and Talib are the best examples of this.
Better to be ineffective in legislation but effective in making your enemies reveal their true colors than to get your name on a few things and forget who has the knife to your back.