Think I saw another user suggest amex? Idk what it is, but maybe look into that?

Not fast enough.

Think about how stupid the average person is, and then remember that about 50 of them are stupider than that! Hahah

You’re arguing with me about something I don’t believe in.

100 unarmed men body a gorilla.

I’m saying I think a gorilla could kill a higher number of unarmed humans than a mammoth could kill of armed humans.

Also, looking into it, I can’t find any videos of an elephant kicking behind itself. I’m not sure that it has any way of defending its backside. I assume mammoths are similar.

Right, I don’t know how you missed it, it’s been unarmed the whole time. It’s built into the premise of the original viral post.

It’s a hypothetical. What you’re saying right now doesn’t matter. The hypothetical premise has always been “unarmed”. Look it up lol.

Edit: i looked it up and cannot find the “original hypothetical premise” I claimed existed, so, fuck me.

That being said… yeah. One man with a weapon bodies a gorilla. People are so fucking stupid.

“Global change”

I said iconic and widely referenced.

The French Revolution has second billing, after the American Revolution, on the wikipedia page for “revolution”.

I don’t care that you think it was minor due to the actual global impact on society. We are in a comment thread on lemmy where a guy made a joke and reference to what is indisputibly one of the most referenced revolutions in all of history.

The guy told a joke that made perfect sense to everyone who read it, except you, apparently. How you can continue to argue against the majority on something that is defined by the majority- I do not know.

You’re acting as if the French revolution isn’t one of, if not THEE most iconic and widely referenced revolutions. It seems like you’re being obtuse.

While I understand what you’re saying, guillotines are symbolic of revolution against government.

I don’t understand why it would change the unarmed gorilla fight? But yes I would assume throwing the spears is almost certainly the most common tactic tbh.

Edit: but also we are talking about spears. If attacking from behind, at spear range, I don’t think a mammoth has opportunity for a trample attack. They would certainly need to swing around and attack with their tusks, giving attackers ample time to back up.

false dichotomy. There are not strictly “good drivers” and “bad drivers”, there are also “okay” drivers.

The premise is and has always been 100 unarmed humans (I think men, specifically).

That is exactly what everyone has been saying the whole time. 100 unarmed humans in a ring with 1 gorilla.

Strong disagree. The sheer maneuverability advantage a gorilla has (over a mammoth) makes it considerably harder for unarmed fighters. A reach weapon that you can poke at the mammoth’s ass, forcing it to run and exert itself on defense. I don’t think the mammoth is killing as many humans as the gorilla, or even a proportional amount.

My only source for fighting animals is my experience fending off a wild dog. But tell me I’m wrong, I want to hear why so I can counterpoint.

Removed by mod

Thank you!

No. Re-read it.

This take is for people that primarily listen to pop music (of any genre, pop rock, pop punk. Stuff that is on the radio). Which is a huge amount of people. But it is unsurprising that on a niche community-based website like Lemmy, where a lot of people probably have an artistic tinge to them, that a bunch of you have a much more involved and active music discovery experience.

“An awful lot” in this context is still relatively little, hence the very apt usage of the phrase “scratching the surface”.

deleted by creator

Okay bud.