• easily3667@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    32 seconds ago

    Fun fact if they removed those images the other ones would scoot up. It’s a reactive design.

    • falcunculus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      A big issue with AI is precisely how just a few people can inundate the rest of us with their mass-produced slurry of AI content.

    • tasho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      but actual artwork does exist? so when you want art references for style references, why should you be forced to see a bunch of AI?

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I explicitly filter out pinterest from my search results because it’s garbage

    • Frenezul0_o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s weird that the OP has such high regard for Pinterest. I have always seen it as search-result polution and never really understood why it exists, other than as proof that we need to have search functions like “-site:____”.

  • haverholm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    And these tweets are almost a year old. His Pinterest feed must just be a white screen by now.

  • Thrife@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Before Ai Pinterest had stolen pictures without crediting or linking to the real artists while this shit got pushed to every image search. I hope this will be its final nail in the coffin.

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      When it very first started, it was a great visual bookmark service. I sew/crochet/craft, and it was nice being able to save a pic of the finished shirt and have it automatically linked to the pattern’s website. Like most things, it went to shit after they tried to monetize it.

      • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I have a couple of friends who use it like that. I hate when they send me links, it’s like those people who used to spray you with perfume in department stores.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m trying to imagine how that is possible, Pinterest always showed up in google search results with something that looked promising but didn’t actually exist on their site. I can only imagine that it’s even worse now post-AI.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Ostensibly the onus would be on the user not to post them in the first place (or at least tag them), but if the users are spammers then… shrug.

      Maybe we should have small, networked clusters of minimal-profit communities interested in moderating themselves? Nah, the internet was never like that…

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That would be nice, but who’s going to pay for it? Because free hosting is pretty rare, nowadays.

          The Fediverse is working OK. So are some image hosts like catbox.

          I dunno about at scale, but the old idea is that nothing really needs to be the scale of Facebook, Pintrest or whatever. Bulk storage is reasonable. A single modern server can do a lot.