All I want to do is play Castlevania: Rondo of Blood. That’s all I want to play right now. But, leave it to Konami to not ever bundle it in any of the Castlevania bundles they’ve released so far. And leave it to Konami to exclusively lock it to a small bundle that is exclusive to a previous gen console such as the PS4 with NO plans of ever reaching PC.
So what are my options now? Emulate of course, so I opted to pirate a copy of Dracula X Chronicles for the PSP after I read that you can play Rondo of Blood. But leave it to Konami to not make it that simple, because you have to complete a certain task in a certain stage at a certain part just to simply UNLOCK the fucking version!
My other option is to emulate the PC-Engine and go through yet another obstacle course just to get one fucking game to run.
This is what brings my blood to a boil, is when there had been perfect opportunities and chances for game devs to do the obvious. If there is a high demand for a game that you know people would want to fucking play, you fucking bundle it and fucking release it.
You do not have a damn argument to stand by against piracy, game devs, when you have to make it such a pain in the ass for people to spend time and effort just to play a game YOU didn’t want to simply release!
How do you fuck up this badly, Konami? Technically speaking, Rondo of Blood is a 16-bit game, so there was no excuses to have not included it in the initial Castlevania Anniversary Collection. But of course, just nostalgia bait everyone with all of the other games they could’ve emulated several times as easier than it is just to get the ONE game you didn’t want to bundle.
So fuck you.
I agree with your second statement, but not your first
Which is completely fair honestly. I don’t expect everyone to feel the same or look at the issue the same way, even in the piracy community.
I still feel that if there is no easy way to play it legally, Konami or whichever company is relevant can go fuck themselves and I’ll pirate the game instead.
Imagine somebody dangling a cookie in front of your face, but refuses to give it to you unless you complete a set of certain unrelated and difficult tasks, despite you offering to just pay to take the cookie. Yet the cookie is still being dangled in your face.
This is that problem.
So I put on a mask to hide my identity and take the cookie if I want it, but without believing that I am entitled to it.
Bingo. But imagine they keep dangling that cookie in front of your face, taunting and teasing you even in the privacy of your own home, but will not let you purchase it on its own. In fact, in order to obtain said cookie, you must complete a bunch of unrelated tasks/purchase a bundle/subscription along with it. And then you only get the one cookie. This is how the video media world works.
The music industry figured it out already by letting you take as many cookies as you want, of all kinds, without limitations, for a flat monthly fee.
In fairness, that comes with just not paying artists any money.
That… is a very fair point.
However, that could be resolved entirely by cutting out C-suite/shareholder profits and redirecting that money to the artists. But we all know that’s never going to happen.
I’d love it if we had a music co-op sort of situation. But as you say, that doesn’t make someone somewhere filthy rich.
Congrats on being wrong
I don’t think “because I want it” is a justification for having a right to something. I also pirate things sometimes, which is why I’m here, but I don’t believe I have a right to the content.
So why do you pirate then?
The main reasons people pirate are:
Don’t get me wrong, I would have happily bought a copy if it was available. But because of 1, 3, 4 and 5 alone completely justifies pirating.
I pirate if something is otherwise unavailable simply because I want to. But I don’t believe I have a right to whatever I want. It’s pure entitlement. I will almost always go the paid route if I can.
I really dig your stance, support developers where you can. How do you feel about TV shows though? Does the knowledge that most shows use product placement (baked in ads) alleviate entitlement in this case?
Like I said: congrats on being wrong. All people have the right to the content anyone else makes and releases for sale if it’s portable, period. Capitalism does not override the right to enjoy the creations of other humans, full stop
I disagree. I believe artists and creators should have the right to control the distribution of their work. There’s plenty of room for criticism of the way we have it structured, the role of profit, whether companies should have the same rights, etc. But I don’t think every person has an intrinsic right to anything that anyone else has ever created.
Once you release something into the open world, it’s no longer yours to control, end of story. Don’t want to lose control over something? Keep it for yourself
This is the second time in this thread someone has responded to me with “end of story” or “full stop” as if those statements are some kind of trump card that removes any room for debate or changes the fact that what you said is an opinion.
It’s literally just how that works, man, it’s not an opinion. You might believe people should be able to, but the existence of piracy proves that to be not how it works
If even one other person copies your data it’s not in your control anymore, it’s in theirs