• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    My neighbors daughter had one of those water guns. I told her if she shoots at me, I’ll get the hose and retaliate. She grinned, shot at me, and ran away laughing.

    I talked to her dad, he nodded, and when she came back for more mischief, she got wet.

  • cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    As a parent, if my kid did that, I’d likely side with the neighbour. I would put it (very loosely) in the category of “natural consequence” punishments.

    It fits the crime, it discourages the crime, it forces empathy with the cat, and it does no real harm.

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is my favorite answer. I’d argue that he got less than the natural consequences of his actions. In nature, when one assaults another, even with something as harmless as water, it’s usually reasonable to interpret it as a threat, the response to which is usually violence. That kid is lucky he didn’t get a face full of claws. I’ve gotten a lot worse from gently touching cats that, as it turned out, didn’t want to be touched. Boundaries are important.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Natural consequences doesn’t mean “law of the jungle” here. It just means linking cause and effect in a proportionate manner.

        I tend to use a lot of “natural consequence parenting”. Basically, the response should flow from the cause. If you throw water over your friend, you can’t then complain if they throw water over you. You learn that, while it’s fun when expected, it can be deeply unpleasant when unexpected.

        It’s a lot more effective than random generic punishments. The trick is shielding them from excessive results, while allowing proportional ones to play out. E.g. swinging on a chair will get a warning, but often not stopped. When they fall, there’s an “I told you so” before/with the cuddle. If there is a risk of a more serious injury however, e.g. the corner of a table where their head may hit, then I step in and stop things.

        • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t have kids but this is pretty much how my dad raised me. It made me really respect when he gave me a hard no for something, it meant “no really the risk majorly outweighs the reward” and even if I didn’t understand it at the time I trusted it. I got a lot of I told you so after varying seriousness of injuries lol. Eventually I learned that the soft warning meant I was going to have a lot of fun but I needed to be ready for if it went sideways. Now I’ve got a pretty healthy sense of my own limits and when to start gauging risk/reward

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s basically the goal I’m aiming for. It’s also worth remembering to always give an (age appropriate) explanation with the “no”. If you’re using a hard no, then there is something they don’t yet understand. Explaining it lets them integrate that knowledge into their future risk management.

            The only downside is their confidence is high enough to terrify me! The job of containing and shaping that confidence, without damaging it gives me plenty of grey hairs.

        • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          As a native social media pedant, I’d just like to take a moment to split hairs and point out that’s the literal definition of that phrase.

          With all that said, I’m glad you’ve taken that approach. They’re very lucky to have you. I wish I could’ve had more adults like that in my life as a child. Here’s to you and your contribution to supporting the next generation. May they pass on those values, too.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s why I clarified. There’s 2 ways to read the phrase, one a lot harsher than the other.

            It seems to be working well. It also results in me being surprised a lot of the time. I’m ready to deal with a scuffed knee, or a bruised ego. Instead they either get back up and try again, or just pull it off. At that point I need to mentally correct for their new capabilities.

            The key thing is, I’m not looking after a small pet, I’m training a future adult. They need to both instinctively understand how the world works, while packing as much awesomeness and magic into the formative years as possible. Letting them learn and practice is a big part of that.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think it depends a bit on where the cat is. If my cat is in somebody’s yard and the owner does not like it, it’s perfectly fine to spray my cat with water. In fact I do the same to my neighbours cat to prevent cat fights. If my cat is on neutral territory, I would be more pissed.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Agreed, there are 1001 context points that could change things around, one way, or the other.

    • baines@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      …,clea.rly ,.com.,.,mas .,….a n .,.d ,p,e,r,i,o,d,s……,.,.,areimportant

    • tauren@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is what big comma and periods want you to believe. Don’t be a fool!

    • Viskio_Neta_Kafo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      please dont say we need to use correct grammer its unnecessary periods or commas in all of history have never really added anything to a sentence or body of text writing is about the soul not trying to control peoples formatting formatting its self is often overrated and not at all necessary inorder to discern what the meaning is of the writers passage

        • M137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That’s the disturbing part, people are so dumb that it’s often impossible to know if it’s sarcasm or stupidity. We’ve gotten to a point where it’s often “this is too dumb/weird/illogical to be sarcasm”.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Idk,

    Shouting “Hey, don’t do that” loud and clear may be more effective.

    • kid may have thought they where alone and will get jumped from getting caught.

    • May alert the parents their kid is up to mischief.

    • Doesn’t potentially start an escalation war with neighbors

    • Doesn’t carry the small risk of the child falling or otherwise getting hurt with you as an easy blame.

    Think of it like this: Does the kid now understand the “evil” of their actions to try be better next time. Or will they feel vindicated by their parents support against your “evil”

    • WanakaTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Seriously my first thought if I saw this all occurring and my kid came complaining to me about it is I’d just say “well this is how the cat feels”

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You can tell the people in here thinking it’s ok to retaliate like that are people that live alone with cats or in their parents basement with cats. I have cats and children. Y’all this isn’t the way to go about this.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    If someone intentionally caused harm to any of my cats, I live near a large national forest, and once you get a few hundred yards off a trail, no one is going to find a body.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Everyone here balancing the ethics of getting wet like it’s assault.

    Water melts snowflakes and wicked witches, everyone else need not worry.

    All living things should be used to being wet either all the time or somewhat regularly. To think beyond that, wow, society has its teeth in you and you are lost.

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It is assault, though.

      Kid acted maliciously towards the cat. It’s not like the kid accidentally knocked a bottle of water and some of it splashed the cat. No. There was a conscious decision to torment the cat by deliberately throwing water over it.

      Punishment fits the crime here.

  • robador51@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    We’ve a lot of cats coming through the garden. I wouldn’t mind if not for my dog, who does and goes insane when she spots a cat. So I’ve been thinking about getting a super soaker to chase them away. I think that’s pretty harmless, and perhaps they learn to skip our garden after a while… What do you lot think?

    • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      As a cat owner I approve using a a super soaker. I use a mini-soaker on my own cats in rare cases (being bengals they love water but despise being sprayed) - they probably catch on quickly and should bolt when they see you reaching for it soon.

      That being said throwing a whole cup at a cat or making it soaking wet is not ok.

      • robador51@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thanks 🙂 I don’t intend to use one of those canon sized ones, I was thinking a mini like you said. Just a little squirt should do the trick 😇