I know this has been debated a lot during his first term but I’m interested in your thoughts now.

  • Yllych [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’d say that historically fascism is a somewhat nebulous term that tries to cover a few disparate movements, but generally speaking has been a capitalist response to a rising domestic communist movement, and so in Marxism has a very specific/scientific meaning in that regard. So without that movement in the United States currently existing Trump doesn’t qualify in my opinion.

    • ihaveibs [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think you could argue that fascism is more generally the capitalist response to existential threats, which historically was domestic socialist and communist movements, but this definition leaves space to potentially include the present day US. Also, there is an interesting thread to pull relating to how the Trump admin is responding to crises borne out of the contradictions of neoliberalism, which in itself is a form of anticommunist repression created (in part) in response to the domestic socialist movements of the early 20th century.

    • MidnightPocket [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Until you realize that the media focus on Sanders from 2014-2020 was for the purpose of stoking fascism while maintaining an absolute stranglehold on socialist organization.

      The state tends to do things.

    • Spongebobsquarejuche [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      But what if through indoctrination you turn generations of Americans into sleeper agents who will begin frothing at the mouth with fear and anger at the thought of a ‘communist’.

      Then start calling lunch ladies communists.