And you fundamentally misunderstand how post- totalitarian societies work.
It’s not about data availability but will to pursue these things.
Which to some degree can be necessary to avoid final decomposition of civil cohesion.
Besides: Crowd sourced data collection is rarely viable as judical evidence. Very rarely.
And then it becomes either a witchhunt or a nice to know thing but nothing more.
You’re having a fundamental misunderstanding of how effective crowd-sourced data collection can be.
Are you really this naive?
Yeah, i guess so.
For a second there, I thought that democracy and fundamental human rights were under attack, and a call to action was in order.
I’ll be quiet, and maybe binge watch something.
Thanks for pulling me back from the brink.
You are very kind and thoughtful.
And you fundamentally misunderstand how post- totalitarian societies work. It’s not about data availability but will to pursue these things. Which to some degree can be necessary to avoid final decomposition of civil cohesion.
Besides: Crowd sourced data collection is rarely viable as judical evidence. Very rarely. And then it becomes either a witchhunt or a nice to know thing but nothing more.
Whelp, best of luck to you and your contrairianism.
Glashouse it is, isn’t it?
Same to you and your faith and not fact based approach,mate.