• Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is a really interesting point. But the fascist art is always historic “better times” shit, depicting an old world in a utopian way (without people in it). It’s never the future.

    • enkifish [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      Counterpoint: Italian futurism. Though I don’t think drawing a futuristic city with lots of trees is fascist, I think it’s pining for more green spaces. Or for built environments to be aesthetically more pleasant than a sea of asphalt.

      • TheLastHero [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        Italian futurism preceded fascism, though but only by a few years and was co-opted and later marginalized. Mussolini was kind of riding Futurism’s coattails and then vice versa as fascism developed more. An interesting example though.

    • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      This isn’t true. Even aside from Italian futurism, there is also art of places like “Germania,” the proposed super-city that some Nazis dreamed of making the capitol of the conquered world.