- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
This is sad for me
Behind every production of the film there’s a story, the sad thing is that in the future the film production will be based mainly on the prompt
film production will be based mainly on the prompt
Or the script, if you will. Actually, probably the director will be a prompt engineer who takes the script and has a vision for the overall movie and each scene then rewrites it into prompts using frameworks they build or buy to do this.
Honestly, the problem really comes down to reducing diverse input into the creative process. I.e., actors won’t do their own thing such as improvise that is off script. Or maybe they will since our current version of AI hallucinates so much.
At least this is evolving to the point anyone with a vision, determination, and the will to create will be enabled to make films. I, for one, welcome our new AI enabled film making overlords.
A camcorder, the woods, and some fucking construction paper can enable someone to make a film. It’s been happening since the invention of video cassettes. Earlier, even (cost notwithstanding). At least with this slop, there’s no human spark.
Nobody would watch the slop without human spark. I’ve seen early renditions of what AI video generation can do. It sucks. Nobody would watch that slop. However, with proper tooling to allow a human to create something, it will be amazing.
Maybe the idea was to demonstrate that AI just isn’t there yet.
Its embarassing the way they present it. Oh its just a test, made by one artist… yeah it feels like one dude pooped this out in 2 weeks. It doesnt show the potential of AI, it shows ILM testing to see if people will accept an inferior product.
I could see AI zealots calling this a false flag operation.
It really is absurd how generic the results are. You would assume ILM would use it to augment, not replace.
