Release the grepstein files!

Damn, looks like Trump finally took the W 😔

It’s an exaggeration for the purposes of humor. Its not that deep.

Lol it says it right at the end of your quote.

Nostr is a protocol, not a platform. Your whole quote backs up exactly what I said.

People swear there’s secret sauce in the Cachy kernel too.

It sounds like it brings you joy

PieFed head dev is a great guy, as far as I can tell.

But he’s so good at being bright red and angrily pouring out booze!

Tony looks different than I remember.

But that was before Grendel… Or was it after…

twitter-like microblogging platform he couldn’t be banned from.

Wow, what a good faith breakdown!

No, he wanted the ability to build microblogging platforms (among other stuff) on top of a decentralized relay network.

But of course, you only skim-read, so can’t blame you too much.

Ah yes, Twitter, the famous protocol for sending signed JSON blobs over a relay network.

Either you believe that the Bitcoin infestation is all just a total coincidence, or you don’t.

Of course it’s not a coincidence.

Now would you like to back up your original claim, or admit that it wasn’t what you meant? I didn’t want to play these stupid games, but clearly you have an agenda here.

Say “Rent free.”

Lol so easy.

I provided proof. With links.

Sigh, I guess you do want to play games.

Okay – no you didn’t. Neither of those links demonstrate that the purpose behind creating Nostr was to exchange cryptocurrency. Would you like to try again? Or accept that you didn’t mean it like that?

Will you back up your claims that the Bitcoin crap that infests the app and its community is just a coincidence?

Did you reply to the wrong person or something…? I never made any claims like that…

Deleted by moderator

Deleted by moderator

I never said you said you were a progressive.

Oh wow, that is easy!

Correct, I live rent-free in your head and you talk about me instead of to me.

All set?

I asked you for counterevidence to the claims, not apologism.

Then you don’t know how burden of proof works. Instead of demanding that you back up your claim, I accepted that you wanted to water it down and refine it into something you could better defend. Which is a very milque-toast, who-cares claim.

Do you want me to have forced you to back up your original claim and devolve into semantics?

Show what?