

So I guess it’s China’s turn at the Graveyard if ISIS-K keeps being successful in harming Chinese Nationals and the Taliban failing in protecting China’s interests


So I guess it’s China’s turn at the Graveyard if ISIS-K keeps being successful in harming Chinese Nationals and the Taliban failing in protecting China’s interests


Stop data collection and AI implementation


“I only want people I like to join. If you say no I will punish you.”


The thing is there is no way to entice this that wouldn’t also make it hard to properly enforce that proposed transphobic policy.
Actually with the direction things are going it’s not only trans people the Administration has to worry about getting easy access to fire arms.
Turns out yes, you can’t have a dictatorship in a nation where the population is well armed


Oh indeed that there is certainly a big flaw and I hope the Wikipedia volunteers can counter that


Am I wired in that I myself personally don’t like these “flexible schedules” systems?
Not disregarding them entirely as no doubt for others it’s a benefit.
But for myself I honestly prefer having a set consistent schedule. Preferably the weekend (and only because of what the job I have weekends is the busy time compared to weekdays.)


Not when the source is paying that part of the bill, AKA the AI company (or in this case Microsoft.)
“You can plug our site into your AI models. But you need to pay the estimated cost of the increased traffic plus some odd percentage.”
I am honestly only guessing myself since greed doesn’t make sense for a non-profit foundation that is funded entirely by good will donations


I am referring to the reply comment from surewhynotlem. They say that cost is 180 million while Wikipedia has 170 million on hand. That is a 10 million deficit.
While probably not enough to shut down the site it is still operating in the red.
Where I was going is explaining how it’s possibly not greed. Just the foundation looking for another revenue source that theoretically would not ruin the site.
That alt being a deal that gets Wikipedia more traffic


Well as mentioned Wikipedia seems to be in the red and not making enough donations to pay for the expenses. So maybe the foundation is thinking it would help with the deficit.
Also chances are Microsoft will instruct Co-Pilot to prioritize Wikipedia whenever it scours the internet for information.
Think it like that eye rolling Google paying Firefox to be the default search engine deal.


You do know Programers are behind the Fediverse correct?


It’s a non-profit foundation with the majority being volunteers. If greed was the case one then would have to ask is why not just go ahead and inject ads


Now if GW made nice and let fan works be allowed


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator
Or you really don’t understand the profession in question.
The Tech bros are not the standard of a Programmer (if they even are programmers by trade to begin with.)
And ass lawyers that defend the corporates and dictators are not the standard of a lawyer by Trade.
It’s Capitalism that is to blame as things like AI are profit generators