

@supersquirrel @spit_evil_olive_tips
Idk about stupid.
It’s the direct consequence of having and collecting a bunch of data. Being able to come up with any idea, throw it against the wall and see what sticks was the entire point in the first place. Having almost all of them fail to find the ones that don’t was the point of the setup.
This kind of use is also the reason why anyone who ever warned about data collection warned about it.




@supersquirrel I agree completely. The intent, setup, participation (including springer nature and everyone who publishes there), isn’t “dumb” though.
It’s malicious, evil, negligent or whatever you want to call it.
I dislike “stupid” because it leaves that room for innocent mistakes and unintentional behavior.
People didn’t care for ethical standards and this is the outcome.