What I’d like to see is the case for backdoors.
What exactly would secret backdoors enable governments to do that they can’t do with end to end encryption already?
Once we have that list, we can weigh the pros and cons, and come to a logical conclusion (which, let’s be honest, is that backdoors are a horrible idea).
But let’s put the ball back in their court. How would this benefit them, and by extension, how would it benefit US?
And listing bad things people do to good people isn’t a benefit. It may be a driving “do something” reason, but there’s no actual benefit there beyond good publicity (which can’t happen if it’s private).
Yeah, pretty much what I stated on the original article. Local security risk if something is already compromised, and endemic to the Bluetooth spec.