Duke / King of Wu are the same person in the story.
King of Wu had an opportunity to kill king of Yue but instead chose to be merciful and it ended badly for him, now king of Yue has an opportunity to kill king of Wu so he should take it or else it he might repeat king of Wu fate.
From what I know, it’s rediculous disinformation to try and make the connection between regime-change NGOs and students.
Diana writes the protest leader “learned organizing skills in numerous programs and workshops funded by Western foundations” and both his parents are prominent NGO leaders so it does sound like he was groomed and educated to become a regime change actor, you don’t get a more direct connection than that…
Reminds me a bit of how it turned out Joshua Wong took part in some “leadership development course” organised by NED, read regime change training, before orgnising the protests.
Over 1 million preventable deaths in EU a year. Just last week EU pledged to more than double military spending, an increase of 613 billion EUR, so you can expect that figure to grow very rapidly.
Also look at this graph:
You can clearly see two groups of countries, ones with huge preventable mortality are all ex communist countries. Thank fuck for capitalism and EU membership huh?
Just happens to be the same person who insisted on calling Ukraine “Nazikraine”, claimed Ukraine never existed and isn’t a nation, and that Nazism is the core of Ukrainian national identity. What a coincidence.
There was a conspiracy in the Labour party to sabotage him, and there was an organised smear campaign in the media across the political spectrum from the Guardian to Telegraph, but in the end it’s the regular Brits who refused to have him. He wasn’t some fringe communist, he was the leader of a party in a two-party state ffs. It didn’t take a lot of research to find out what his policies were, the manifesto was widely available and printouts were left at so many doorsteps, mine included. But the daft fucking removed chose Bojo cause look at his hair this bloke must be right larf down the pub. And that’s the most charitable reason cause if not that, it was the burning desire to harm brown and queer folks at any cost.
Thank you! I’m planning a trip there so wondered how disruptive the protests are cause going with a small child.
Thank you! Could you comment on this article?
https://consortiumnews.com/2025/05/27/diana-johnstone-serbias-organized-chaos/
Honestly I was just thinking exactly the same thing. They will make it unliveable for people and blame it on Russia, and then make them chose, “so do you want peace or welfare? Cause you can’t have both” and we’ll watch the support for the war skyrocket cause Brits are so used to leaching off other countries they believe it’s their manifest destiny.
How was your trip? Are protests visibly affecting regular life, infrastructure, transport?
Thank you for this.
Thank you comrade.
deleted by creator
Thank you! Do you know what the protests are even supposed to be about? All I could find was “anti-corruption” which is vague as shit and reminds me of Navalny who somehow fought “corruption” by calling to exterminate immigrants like cockroaches…
Yeah it does look this way, thank you very much comrade.
Thank you!
Which UK political party would you recommend joining? I’ve been circling around CPB hoping they drop their TERF stance but that doesn’t seem to be happening any time soon: https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/communist-party-and-young-communist-league-welcome-supreme-court-ruling-definition
Please do elaborate!
@ComradePupIvy would likely be interested too but I’m tech illiterate and can’t figure out how to @ them.
BTW is this a good article on them? https://www.ebb-magazine.com/essays/inside-the-last-days-of-the-cpgb-ml
CPGB-ML are so, so much worse than TERFs. CPB (and WPUK they keep supporting) are TERFs.
CPGB-ML are against any and all “LGBT ideology” and they will expell members for it. They are against all “identity politics” with very narrow exceptions for women’s rights and anti-racism.
I can’t find it now but there was a tweet on their official account comparing gay rights to guide dogs for the blind in an attempt to drive home just how frivolous gay rights are, arguing those are not class issues but special group interests - and alienating everyone who cares about either queer liberation or disability justice in one fell swoop.
They are not just tailist, they are full on right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc), and I will die on this hill. They also collaborate with US patsocs and promote them.
Nazbols / patsocs pretend to be Marxist-Leninists and there are always some people around ML spaces who sympathise with them. There’s nobody here who thinks NYT present the correct Marxist-Leninist line.
If this was posted as “Inteview with Joti Brar the patsoc TERF” I wouldn’t report it, alas it’s posted as:
Joti Brar of CPGB-ML is the daughter of the late Harpal Brar.
“Neutrality Studies” is some Swiss nonsense, but at least they’ll listen to communists and anti-imperialists.
I could say all those things about the BBC, the Guardian, etc, and yet there’s no rule against posting them. I already explained why I think right deviationists in particular are banned, I might be wrong, I didn’t wright those rules this is just how I understand them. This is also what makes sense to me, I think banning New York Times is counterproductive but banning Haz is not.
Awesome story!