

Some jurisdictions classify “sale” as broadly as “transfer of data to any other company, for a ‘benefit’ of any kind” Benefit could even be non-monetary in terms of money being transferred for the data, it could be something as broadly as “the browser generally improving using that data and thus being more likely to generate revenue.”
To avoid frivolous lawsuits, Mozilla had to update their terms to clarify this in order to keep up with newer laws.
I genuinely didn’t realize that was the reason they said they were coming from insane asylums.
Like, I legitimately didn’t even consider the possibility because it was just that stupid. I’m simultaneously kicking myself for not figuring it out, but also glad my brain isn’t stupid enough to quickly make the same connection they did.