• voluble@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Canada needs allies now probably more than ever in its history. What we see here coming from the monarchy is not a meaningful gesture of alliance. That’s what I’m bitter about. It’s monarchs doing what monarchs do after they’ve squeezed all the benefit from colonial conquest - they bandy meaningless symbols about. That benefits them, because conveniently, it costs them nothing to ‘stay out of politics’.

    As a Canadian, it’s truly frightening to see world leaders reluctant to simply say the words ‘we stand behind Canada’.

    What does the word ‘Commonwealth’ even mean if the British monarchy can’t say that and mean it.

    • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      He’s our king but he doesn’t rule us. We stand for ourselves, and instead of keeping the item that was supposed to mark the start of his tenure, he immediately gave it to an ally that is being impinged upon.

      • voluble@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I understand that. And I guess I’m not convincing anyone in this thread, but, things like this, and how the article gushes about Elizabeth’s ‘brooch warfare’, I fail to see how these are things that Canadians ought to feel good about or empowered by. They don’t benefit us in any way.

        • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You say that but they do. The Crown doesn’t have the authority to tell people to go get fucked directly anymore, there are the prime ministers and the rest of our elected officials.

          So instead of actually doing nothing, they give a threatened man a weapon and show in other ways that they stand behind their people.