• slaacaa@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m wondering which of these 2 options is true for the chief techbro who came up with this:

    1. They are genuinely clueless, and have never used ChatGPT for more than 5 minutes
    2. They know the limitations of LLMs well, but they want to ride the AI hype to inflate their company value (and maybe cut some costs by downsizing)
    • dwemthy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They believe in infinite growth. They think LLMs are going to get reliable fast. LLMs have probably played a direct role in convincing them of that

  • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ever since their content is being created or at least sub crrated by AI the quality has gone down noticeable, ive seen so many incorrect sentences which is shit when trying to learn a language. And if i, as a beginner learner can figure out wrong sentences what the actual fuck is ai doing?

  • tauren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    AI could make Duolingo better because it doesn’t teach a language in its current state. It could explain to the user why their answer is wrong and offer exercises. But instead of doing that, they simply replace employees to save money? What a garbage company. It’s a shame their app is so popular. It gives people nothing but a false sense of learning.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was gonna say language learning is actually one of the few AI might be useful for, but they’re not talking about making their users learn with a little AI translator having a random conversation with them; they’re replacing their workforce with AI.

    Fuck. I was considering using Duo once I finish school to give myself some more options to flee the US as we dive deeper into nazism. Any good alternatives?

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem with current AI text generation is that it can be wrong, which is bad if you are trusting it with giving correct information to learn

      Deepl, even though its made for translating, it is often wrong

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I know I’m going to sound like a stock Marxist from the 1930s, but: AI is a means of production and therefore should be collectivized.

    • x4740N@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      As someone learning Japanese

      There’s no fucking way AI would be able to assist in learning a second language

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    For the first time ever, teaching as well as the best human tutors is within our reach.

    No it fucking isn’t. The video calls are awful and don’t do anything to help you learn why what you said is wrong. Lilly just acts confused and ignores what you said. And in their normal explanations it just assumes why you didn’t know something, gives an answer for what it guessed, and doesn’t do anything else. The old explanations were much better than the new garbage they offer.

  • Drew@sopuli.xyzM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Duolingo has been using AI for a bit at least for their content, and it sucks

  • PDFuego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I haven’t used the app for a while, but I still have it installed. The delete account button doesn’t work, and neither does the feedback button. Cool.

  • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This email makes no sense.

    Let me paraphrase them:

    We bet on mobile and won big. AI is great. AI tutors are a thing.

    Therefore we’ll get AI to understand our codebase and get it to fo stuff people did before

    This isn’t “betting on” AI. This is outsourcing to AI.

    You can be an AI company (theoretically) - have people make AI models that are then deployed. Note the lack of recursively, made-by-AI-for-AI products and services.

    Tbh, Duolingo was always a gimmick. It doesn’t teach you a language. It teaches you small snippets of 5-10 words each with little to no grammar. It’s repetitive and boring. It was that way before the lives they said they’d never add.

    They lost me as a user when they rolled out lives.

    Now, I hope they lose someone else.

    Duolingo has potential. But learning a language always required a large time investmant, and it always will.

    I assume its lessons will only get worse than they already are.