• wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    In their moral justification, the argument of the lesser evil has played a prominent role. If you are confronted with two evils, the argument runs, it is your duty to opt for the lesser one, whereas it is irresponsible to refuse to choose altogether. Its weakness has always been that those who choose the lesser evil forget quickly that they chose evil.

    -Hannah Arendt

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is such a rigid and literal way of thinking. This mentality explicitly idealizes and romanticizes black and white thinking. Life has shades of gray, no matter how much you wish it was as simple as literal Good versus Evil

      • m532@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Life has shades of gray is usually said by those who are 100% evil

        Shades of gray dont exist irl. There’s humans, and there’s the inhuman creatures who genocide humans

    • TBi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think everyone should pick the best person for the position. But if the only two realistic options are evil and lesser evil. Then I think it’s better if the lesser evil wins than the more evil one.

      As seen in last US election, voting for the ideal candidate meant the worse candidate won.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Stop acting like only having two political parties is the only way we can do things. I invite you to step outside the box you are trapped thinking in.

        • TBi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think we should only have two parties. But with FPTP voting that’s what happens. You need to change to ranked voting system.

          Also I think everyone should vote for who they want. Unless it means the worse candidate wins… in FPTP that’s what happens. You need to vote strategically.

      • The Menemen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You could easily argue that the guys constantly chosing the lesser evil brought that catastrophic discourse shift over us, that made the lesser evil of this election worse than the worse evil of former elections.

        I am not from the US, so my insight there might be limited. But here in Germany I started to hate the lesser evil fraction so much. The lesser evil here is now openly representing far right ideologies, activley supporting genocide, made it borderline illegal to critizise genocid, killing refugees at the borders, deporting people into regions were they face immediate lethal threats, initiating harsh social cuts while demonizing the poor and are discussing cooperation with open fascists. They are constantly normalizing open fascism, everday a little more. If Germany slights into fascism again, it will be mostly the lesser evils fault.

        Fuck the lesser evil. They became more dangerous than the fascist themselves in many respects.

        It was also Hindenburg and von Papen back in the 1930s, the lesser evil, who was paving Hitler the way to power.

        edit: Lol, I startet this meaning to write 2-3 sentences, seems the lesser evil caused a writing frenzy in me.

      • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s amazing to me that you could read that quote, and your take, unironically, is exactly the sentiment that Arendt was warning about.