eah@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1243arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1238arrow-down1external-linkHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.orgeah@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square38linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·1 month agoDo you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
minus-squaredylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month agoNo, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting. Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.
Do you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
No, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting.
Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.