The war is going great. 
Yet another horrifying scene which would be plastered all over network news if only it were happening in Russia instead.
It’s not “authoritarianism” if it’s happening in a US ally (or puppet).
The war is going great. 
Yet another horrifying scene which would be plastered all over network news if only it were happening in Russia instead.
It’s not “authoritarianism” if it’s happening in a US ally (or puppet).
Hallucinating “attempts” at attacks. Awesome.
Ah yes, the ‘hallucinated’ events, such as the invasion of Iraq, the occupation of Kursk, the genocide of Palestine, operation ‘Spiderweb’ (where NATO blatantly committed a war crime), invasion of Afghanistan, the bombings of civilians (including by Ukraine), invasions of Syria, Libya, etc.
What is actually being hallucinated is Russia supposedly kidnapping and not repatriating children.
Oh Ukraine did those. Wow.
Out of those things that I did mention, Ukraine directly took part in the invasions of Iraq and Syria (which means proximate, though indirect, participation in the ongoing genocide of Palestine), as well as operation ‘Spiderweb’ (which was literally a blatant war crime), the occupation of Kursk, and it has - as I have mentioned - engaged in bombing of civilians. You are completely fine with all of that.
The rest of the world (which includes Russia) has every right to defend itself against the most prolific invader in the world. You don’t get to dictate the rest of the world how to resist you.
Also, you are yet to suggest how else Russia should have prevented NATO from deploying near the former’s most populated areas.
Attacking somebody else, is not an attack on Russia. They could have went and supplied their own troops to their allies.
So, your argument is literally ‘the most prolific invader in the world - NATO - that is currently engaging in a genocide, which is known for its attacks on civilians and unprovoked aggression, and which completed a coup in Ukraine, and was trying to get its troops and weapons near Russia’s most populated areas would totally not have done anything against Russia if Russia did not resist in any way, pinkie promise’. Your argument is silly.
Also, Ukraine has done things like occupy Kursk, and it has bombed civilians, both in Russia proper and in territories that you consider to belong to Ukraine.
Even without that, Ukraine joining NATO is an act of aggression not just against Russia, but also against the rest of the world. Ukraine has already invaded Iraq and Syria, which already warrants military action against Ukraine.
You’re just so rabid about this. And NATO had no role in organising the Iraq invasion. What are you on about?
And coup? What coup? The dissolution and Democratic reformation of their parliament in 2008?
‘Why do you hate my nazi Germany so much? Why can’t you forgive some tiny little genocides and invasions that my empire has been committing? Boo hoo’.
HAHAHAHA.
Ah yes, it totally wasn’t states like the US, the UK, Germany, Ukraine, etc. doing that. No NATO state was ever involved. /s
The one that the USian representatives bragged about spending so much money on, and which they discussed in leaked correspondence. The one where they overthrew a democratically-elected president and replaced him with a series of puppets.
I appreciate your efforts trying to educate someone, though I think this is the most obnoxious lib I’ve seen in a while.
I do wonder how these sorts will behave when the war is over. I predict the western media will blame Ukraine, so these people who act like every Ukrainian is a perfect saintly figure will do a quick 180 and add them to the “Asiatic hordes” alongside Russia. They love their NATO propaganda so damn much that they will happily stab anyone in the back if asked by their overlords in Washington.