I’m new to this idea and a Google girl so I’m interested in learning more. I’m not good with tech, but if it’s necessary I’ll do it as much as I can.

  • akademy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Google has moved far away from “do no evil”.

    I feel like I’m always being watched - just to make some rich person richer.

    I don’t like ads, they’re a menace to society, I will find something if I need it.

    They have too much control in the world.

    It’s not just Google. But we don’t need any of them. It’d be better if they didn’t exist.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    If Google randomly decides to terminate my account for some reason and won’t tell me why or allow me to reasonably appeal, I’m screwed.

    GDrive, my YouTube, my play store purchases, my Gmail going back since forever, and even all these 3rd party sites where I used “login with Google” could be instantly toasted and irrecoverable.

    I became aware that this is way way too much exposure to one company and every component is linked together so if, hypothetically, I left a comment on YouTube that triggered some angsty AI ban algorithm, which led to the whole account getting zapped, I would be one sad puppy.

    Better to selfhost, encrypt all, and be in control of my own destiny.

    • thecoffeehobbit@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Exactly this. As a European I don’t feel comfortable anymore relying on any US service for essential needs. Stuff like youtube is fine, it’s just entertainment. But I cannot rely on big tech on anything that, if suddenly gone one day, would cause me any sort of actual annoyance. When you think about it the list is quite long and sneaky.

  • UltraMasculine@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Google collects a lot of personal data and I don’t like it. I disabled every Google app and service that was possible without changing OS or rooting the phone. Then I realized that few apps, that are important to me, did not work correctly without Google Services. So unfortunately I had to re-enable it. I’m using VPN though. Hopefully that messes at least a little bit Google’s data collecting.

    On PC Linux is nowadays my main OS but I have Windows 11 installed too (dual boot). There’s still quite many compatibility problems with Linux.

  • winni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I am de-googled for quite a while. Coming across goggle polluted pages and services really makes me feel bad now, like somebody standing behind me and watching

  • haverholm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I started degoogling because of Google’s more and more transparent business plan of data surveillance. I’m not comfortable with “paying with my information” because of the uncountable (and frankly unimaginable) ways that information can be applied by third parties without my knowledge.

    “AI” is one example which wasn’t even on the chart when I started degoogling, but we can all be certain that Google and partners use any language sample available on Gmail and G drive to train theirs. This is the company that casually registered private WiFi networks in the course of mapping their Maps street view. They’ll harvest everything they can.

    At heart, I don’t trust corporate mega-monopolies to take care of our best interests as online citizens, and as a European I’m super sceptical of becoming subject to less safe legislation (US, Chinese or whatever) that doesn’t offer me protections that I have or expect at home.

    By not using Google (or Meta, or Amazon, or X) I can deliberately pick and choose individual services — or host them for myself — rather than hedge everything on the benevolence of one corporation that doesn’t give a shit about their users.

  • stinerman@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago
    1. I’m trying to be more anti-large corporation, especially those that have bent the knee to Trump.
    2. I want to support the people who make replacement apps/services that have a DIY ethic about them.
    3. I kind of like the challenge of it, because it’s not all that easy…which in my mind shows that it’s necessary.

    If you don’t want to DeGoogle, that’s fine. It’s a personal decision. If you have all the facts and determine you’d rather stay doing what you’re doing, that’s fine.

    • manxu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’d add to that great list also the problem of the steady enshittification of Google products. Just today, I was driving with Google Maps and suddenly it asked if I wanted to stop at a McDonald’s. I haven’t been to McD’s in twelve years, so you know how terribly useful that suggestion was.

      • stinerman@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I find that Maps is one of the most difficult ones to get rid of. There are replacements of course, but they don’t change directions based on current traffic patterns. I also find that for these replacements the routing isn’t very good over medium/long distances.

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Originally it was because suggested results were a waste of time and I had used linux in grad school. I liked being able to use my computer how I wanted. As I learned more and more the ethics became a strong enough motivator I got rid of gmail and stopped using google maps. I’m 100% degoogled now, and I never looked back. Sometimes I have friends or people at work who want to collaborate using google products. I tell them I take an ethical stance against it. I will never go back.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    There’s the privacy and constant tracking part of it, but it is also about not being hostage of the company. What if Drive is suddenly a payed-only service OR they lock me out of my account? I can recover faster and cheaper from a failing HDD in my NAS than I ever could from a locked (or deleted) Google account.

    I’ve seen / was burned too many times by free software and services that suddenly disappeared of became overpriced and I don’t want to be on that position again. Google is well known for killing stuff as well.

    • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah they might lose your account out of sheer incompetence, or because they can’t be bothered to fix a mistake –why care when they are not accountable to anyone except shareholders.

      There was that fun story of the guy who had the misfortune to take a picture of his son to send the doctor, which was flagged as cp and lost all his accounts, the police got involved, and even after the police cleared him Google refused to give him back his account…

      https://nypost.com/2022/08/22/google-bans-dad-for-sending-pics-of-toddlers-swollen-genitals-to-doctor/

      • Chewie@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Absolutely. In a previous company, we migrated from on-site MS Exchange to Google Mail (ugh). Apart from it being a crap experience (it was a new service), and feeling like we were beta testers as things kept changing daily, so writing training material was a PITA, once there was an outage, and even though we had ~10K users on it, they basically said “get in line” when we were chasing for updates etc even though we were a paying customer!

        Fuck them.

  • snroh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    didn’t see anyone touching on the most important part, and that is the decisions regarding our data we make now are coming to bite us in the ass five or ten years from now. our chicken brains can’t comprehend that, not really. we need a direct feedback loop: hot stove, finger, ouch - no more touching.

    up until a decade or two ago, we didn’t have the concept of forever in our lives. do stupid shit in school, in uni they don’t know about it. fail at one job, the next one doesn’t know about it. say something stupid in front of a love interest, the next one’s blissfully unaware. in our current paradigm, all of them transgressions are with you, forever.

    any and all corporations even adjacent to the advertising/harvesting/mining industries have lost the benefit of doubt, forever. our interaction with them is and should be adversarial from the get go. they should never be in the position to retain any meaningful data points and polluting their ingestion avenues and obscuring activity is mandatory.

    edit: the AI example is touching on it.

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    My motivations are not specific to google.

    I don’t want a large part of my life and thoughts to be linked to my identity, queryable in someone else’s database.

    I grew up in DDR and know that a large fraction of people gain pleasure by having control over others. That data is an important avenue for that.

    You can already see that governments all over the EU are trying to gain control over it. (To keep the children safe ofcourse).

        • Lady Butterfly @lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Thanks so much! How many people actually believed in it? How prevalent was the blackmarket? And how safe did people feel?

          • iii@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            How prevalent was the blackmarket?

            Officially, everyone with the same job description had the same wages. This resulted in everyone becoming a slacker. So what eventually developed as a public secret, was that factories tolerated “theft” by the good employees.

            So the person working in the canning factory brought home tins of food every month, which they would sell and/or trade. The boss could claim, and the books would show, that everyone has the same wages.

            This is not limited to labour. Public administrators, for example, would be tolerated to put some people ahead of others for housing/holliday/etc, and they would ask for a fee.

            It was a large, well known taboo that everyone, even party members participated in.

            How many people actually believed in it? And how safe did people feel?

            I can’t speak for the early days. By the time I was born everyone I knew recognized it for what it was: the state as a weaponized tool to steal from and hurt others. An in-group of people decided how much equality and solidarity you deserve. You scratch their back, they grant you their leftovers.

            Lots of the stasi files on people were shredded, and are intentionally slow being reconstructed, as they hope most people will be dead before they can read their own file. But estimates are that around 1-in-3 people were informants for the stasi. These are often neighbours, aunts, coworkers, …

            It was dog-eat-dog, and outside a small bubble you never fully trusted someone. Even then, no guarantees, as the schooling system (tried to) radicalize children into informing about their parents. The teacher would get benefits for each successfull “catch”.

            • Lady Butterfly @lazysoci.alOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Of course! It’s not just a black market, employers need to give incentives to work hard. And it encourages government bribes.

              And yes, however noble the idea, the kind of people attracted to powerful positions often aren’t nice people.

              Trusting nobody is a hard way to live. How did the DDR effect you long term?

              • iii@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Trusting nobody is a hard way to live. How did the DDR effect you long term?

                Quite bad tbh. We managed to emigrate in 98. But the distrust in others, what can you say to who, etc stayed as a reflex that requires cognitive recognition, and therapy, to lessen. I think of it like a light version of split personality.

                • Lady Butterfly @lazysoci.alOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  I get that totally. Things learned in childhood are hard to unlearn. Thanks for sharing it’s interesting and made me sure I want to start degoogling. I do NOT want to give people that power over me

  • palladiumasteroid@my-place.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    @CheeseToastie
    Mainly political. While privacy and security are a concern, I’m more focused on stop using products by big corporations, in particularly those with ties to fascist parties and government agencies and I’m very wary of those who try to sell their products as “private and secure FOSS alternatives” while holding similar fascistic ideas.

  • huquad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    In addition to the privacy aspect, i wanted to reduce my dependency on outside/external factors as much as possible. I try to self-host and use FOSS where possible. Where not feasible, I try to diversify companies so I’m not overly reliant on one. That way, I can pivot much quicker if a company goes to shit.

  • Jack_Burton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Nothing is free. If you don’t pay for the product, you are the product.

    Privacy (different from anonymity) has become more and more important to me, and Google had access to nearly every part of my life in one way or another. I’ve cut out Musk, Zuck and Bezos, and I’m now nearly completely Google free as well.

    I’ve often heard “why do I care if Google reads my emails? I’ve got nothing to hide”. 2 great answers:

    1. Unlock your phone and give it to me for an hour. Just because you have nothing to hide doesn’t mean you don’t want privacy. Google does exactly that.

    2. Speaking of privacy, why bother closing the stall door in a public washroom? You’re not doing anything wrong in there.

  • CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’m trying to generally distance myself from all the VC sprouted billionaire former ‘startups’. They’re a disease. Those smug faces as they turn what they promised to be ‘good’ into a company that develops autonomous killing machines. All those smug bastards at the inauguration, happily paying the deposit to cash in on fascism. Unfortunately Google out of all of them has the deepest claws in me I think, android phone (Apple is in the same club/cartel imo so not much help), gmail, etc.