• Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the dogs don’t eat any food, they all have the same food in the bowl (assuming they don’t drop any). So by that logic, they all have the most food. So the first to arrive wins.

    The outcome is very clear to anyone who has ever played games before, you’re just being very pedantic for pedantic sake.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      If the dogs don’t eat any food, they all have the same food in the bowl (assuming they don’t drop any). So by that logic, they all have the most food. So the first to arrive wins.

      Ok, this makes sense for why first isn’t redundant, I wasn’t thinking about the possibility of ties.

      The outcome is very clear to anyone who has ever played games before, you’re just being very pedantic for pedantic sake.

      No it’s legit confusing. Maybe you’re just better at games but I honestly would not understand a game explained that way.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re not being pedantic at all. Just wanted to say. That was a really odd thing to say. If anything it’s the opposite of pedantry or trying to understand the pedantry of it.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The outcome is very clear to anyone who has ever played games before, you’re just being very pedantic for pedantic sake.

      Please don’t call people pedantic when they’re trying to understand confusing speech. That’s the opposite of pedantry. Pedantry is focusing on specifics when they aren’t really relevant. This person is confused by the specifics.