• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ben Thompson has been saying that they need to collect user data (like google) for a decade.

    It seems the botched Apple Intelligence release changed some minds, a little bit.

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      That still doesn’t give them the right to mine the data that their users entrusted to them though a paid service.

      It doesn’t matter how anonymised their harvesting is, they had an agreement with their subscribers not to invade their privacy like this.

      We are better off with a LLM that doesn’t work than abusing the data entrusted to them by their users.

      It won’t be long until the LLM bubble bursts and we all laugh about how stupid we were to think they had any use whatsoever.

        • Salvo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Is this the same “Opt-In” as keeping Apple Intelligence disabled between software updates?

          Apple are haemorrhaging a lot of hard earned goodwill every time they try to move forward with their own AI.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It would be nice if they actually fixed the stability issues in Apple Intelligence before they start adding more layers of slop to it. Writing tools summarization has been broken off and on since it launched.

    • Reyali@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article.

      The entire thing is explaining how they are upholding privacy to do this training.

      1. It’s opt-in only (if you don’t choose to share analytics, nothing is collected).
      2. They use differential privacy (adding noise so they get trends, not individual data).
      3. They developed a new method to train on text patterns without collecting actual messages or emails from devices. (link to research on arXiv)
      • MurrayL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Right. There’s plenty to criticise Apple for, both in general and for chasing the AI trend, but looking at it purely in terms of user privacy within AI features they’re miles ahead of the competition.

      • hobovision@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I had scanned through it, and it looked like the exact same stuff that Google and Microsoft say. Paraphrasing: “we value your privacy” “we’re de-identifying your data” “the processing occurs on-device”…

        Apple probably is better on privacy than other big tech corpos, but it’s a race to the bottom, and they’re definitely participating in the race.