- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- Research from the World Economic Forum shows it’s becoming easier for citizens to be monitored, allowing governments, technology companies and threat actors to “reach deeper into people’s lives”.
- In response, people are “waking up” to privacy, according to Meredith Whittaker, president of secure messaging service Signal.
- Here, she explores the drivers behind this shift and how it could impact the digital landscape.
Lulz, privacy without food to eat won’t be too useful
OK, I am going to try arguiung that privacy supersedes food:
To have a right to anything means there is something that I own. Owning something puts a division between me and others who can not own this specific thing: My right is my own, I do not have to diminish it by sharing. The most fundamental form of division is absence. Having a right to privacy is a right to the absence from others. Therefore the right to privacy is a more fundamental one than the right to food.
However, I agree that in practice eating in public beats dying in private any time of the day. 🤷
Food isn’t a right though. It’s necessary for life, sure, but nobody is obligated to provide you with food unless you’re incarcerated or something.
That’s also something else to think about
But privacy is? We’ve been eating food much longer than we’ve had any privacy…
Article 25
When I was younger I knew it as the “Right to Food & Shelter”, though I’m not sure if that was taught in a Canadian context.