The prices are the way they are because it is real wool, which doesn’t grow on trees.
If I take a look at other wool pullovers/sweaters from other companies they range from 80-130€ some peeking at about 200€.
So it is that particular material and thus product, not the company that is pricy.
So I don’t quite get your “grow on trees” analogy. They just grow on sheep instead, and require harvesting like they would from a tree, and require food and care like trees. And it’s not like you’re killing them off. So if anything, it’s almost exactly like “growing on trees”
The prices are the way they are because it is real wool, which doesn’t grow on trees. If I take a look at other wool pullovers/sweaters from other companies they range from 80-130€ some peeking at about 200€.
So it is that particular material and thus product, not the company that is pricy.
So I don’t quite get your “grow on trees” analogy. They just grow on sheep instead, and require harvesting like they would from a tree, and require food and care like trees. And it’s not like you’re killing them off. So if anything, it’s almost exactly like “growing on trees”
Cotton is cheaper. It grows on trees, which implicate better availability and easier procurement.
Despite it’s German name Baumwolle, cotton doesn’t grow on trees, like e.g. Kapok does, but on plants which makes it easier to harvest.
Okay. Plants instead of trees. It was a false friend, thanks for pointing out. Striked tree out for good measure.