• TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      Veritasium has an awesome video about the Japanese scientist that discovered blue LEDs, guy basically did it single handedly despite pushback from his boss. Absolutely insane scientific achievement

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      They have impure silicon there so their software dev practices had to become way more advanced to compensate

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    dude had already swallowed the tech bs, thinks ai is the furthest advancement of technology when it can’t compete with ancient tech. literally can’t do what a calculator can do reliably. or a timer. or a calendar.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Please let’s try to keep generative AI from claiming the entire word “AI”.
      Current generative AI is good at and built for mimicking patterns with boundary conditions.
      This means it does a decent job of imitating authoritative knowledge, but it’s just mimicking it.
      People are hyped for it because it looks knowledgeable, it’s relatively simple to make, and a lot of what we do is text based so it’s easy to apply.

      There are a lot of other types of AI, the majority even, that work significantly better, take a small fraction of the computing power and provide helpful and meaningful results. They just don’t look like anything other than complex math, which is all any of them are in the end.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      A calculator, timer or calendar can’t help me write an essay. You are comparing tools meant for different tasks. At least build your argumentets on something reasonable.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Why argue with someone who isn’t intelligent enough to write their essays without mechanical assistance?

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Take an English class you illiterate gremlin.

        Resource intense auto correct that does not understand the information it’s stringing together should not be used to write anything academically or professionally.

            • Owl@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              A calculator, timer or calendar can’t help me write an essay.

              Those are all tools, you’re bashing this guy for using one of them, so I’m bashing you for using a calculator. I’m pretty sure that you used one once in your life

              • Zron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                28 days ago

                Oh I see, you didn’t catch my meaning that AI is a shitty tool for even the thing OP was talking about.

                I refer you to my first comment as guidance on how you can improve your reading comprehension.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    The US isn’t innovating jack shit.

    The US just created a massively polarized and unequal society so that when a country creates a new brilliant researcher or innovation, an American company can buy them out.

    Basically, the insane poverty and lack of government services that the average American experiences gives them enough cash to buy up innovative people, companies, and competitors.

  • Panamalt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Japan still generally places more emphasis on quality over shitting out shiny new, overpriced garbage as fast as possible

  • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I don’t exactly keep up with the technological innovations of every country, but I get the feeling it isn’t so much that Japan hasn’t innovated in decades, so much as they haven’t done anything he (it’s 4chan, let’s be frank, it’s a he) personally finds interesting or that is publicized in the medium he gets his news from.

      • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Yes AI has good uses, it made my job faster, I can now focus on more important things because I’m not wasting time with bullshit that AI can do in a seccond.

        But you can’t say that on Lemmy, here it’s all useless, a scam and gave my dog AIDS.

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          A lot of people here on Lemmy keeps saying that AI is bad because it failed one task it wasn’t built for. Or because it can’t do everything. I don’t get it.

          • lightsblinken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            maybe go for a “its bad because of the return on investment” angle? for the amount of literal billions we have thrown at it, perhaps its ok to expect more. if you gave me a mere couple of billion, i’d make healthy lunches for school kids to foster education and health outcomes (2-4-1!)

  • diverging@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Doc: “No wonder this circuit failed; it says ‘Made in Japan’.”
    Marty: “What do you mean, Doc? All the best stuff is made in Japan.”

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        I think they had a poor reputation and then rapidly improved which led to their current reputation

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          They started out like China, making cheaper copies of Western tech. Then they started to innovate.

          China is now on exactly the same path, and it’s well into the phase where they are innovating, but most people still refuse to acknowledge that.

          • shawn1122@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            Western tech had a massive head start.

            When a country’s tech manufacturing is being developed it’s going to start by making what already exists because… it has to start somewhere.

            It didn’t take long for Japanese cars to supersede American cars. China is now doing the same to both American and Japanese cars. Nissan nearly went out of business and is still in trouble. Tesla’s situation isn’t helped by how dislikable its founder is so its value is plumetting.

            Most countries don’t know how to deal with the advent Chinese EVs so they’re just slapping massive tariffs on them and hoping they figure something out in the meantime.

            It isn’t just going to stop at Japan and China though. Japan was subsidized by the US post WW2 and China built its manufacturing from the ground up. There are many other countries on that path which will lead to significant global competition. The West is going to have to keep its head up if it wants to remain competitive by the end of the century.

            The leading Western nation responding to increased global competition with reactionary protectionism is a bad start. It’s squandering all of the soft power the US has cultivated post WW2 leaving a power vacuum for China and other influential nations on the ascension to capitalize on.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              It’s also worth noting that, economically, it’s not surprising that the country with the most people would have the largest economy.

              There’s nothing fundamentally different between the people of the US and China beyond the conditions they’re born in. Insofar as innovation is a product of economics, educational investment, opportunity for innovation and a random chance it happens, and economic strength is a product of innovation and raw work output, it follows that more people leads to more work output, and eventually to a larger, more innovative economy.

              A disorganized China and some key innovation breakthroughs by the west last century gave a significant headstart, and some of Maos more unwise choices slowed their catch-up, but it’s not surprising that an organized country with five times the US population would surpass us in economics and innovation, to say nothing of being competitive.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Same thing that happens everywhere. Low cost innovation gets expensive as companies grow and salaries rise, profit seekers move to exploit cheaper labor elsewhere.

    • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      That still hasn’t happened in the US though. Hardware is produced overseas but a huge chunk of the most used software in the world is produced in the US. The chips are designed in the US, some produced here but most overseas. Does that only apply to manufacturing?

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Still hasn’t happened in the US? You choose a single industry as an indicator to base a claim on the state of US industry vs vast manufacturing losses the US has faced over the last 50 years?

        • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Whatever. If it’s Linux, Democrat, anti establishment, and anti US then it’s popular on Lemmy, got it. Lemmy feels more and more like it’s just a big group of edgy teenagers.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Sadly Japan may be a culture in decline.
    Their culture is basically work yourself to the bone even more than the US. Young people study their ass off and get a job working long hours while still living at home because they still can’t afford their own place. And you have stuff like if the subway is a minute late they hand out apology slips to workers so they don’t get in trouble with their bosses for being 30 seconds late. Meanwhile there is a very strong ‘defer to elder authority’ note in their culture. And in many industries people are expected to work a 10-hour day and then go drinking with the bus until 2:00 a.m. only to be back at work the next day at 8:00 a.m.
    The end result is young people have neither the time nor the money to have kids. So they don’t.

    Their population is literally aging and shrinking. They are facing a very serious problem in wondering who is going to take care of their elderly. Their birth to death ratio is 0.44, meaning that for every baby born in a year more than two people die. In a nation of about 125 million, the population is shrinking by just under a million every year. That’s not good.

    And while the Japanese people are highly educated and very capable, the ‘defer to authority’ culture prevents the sort of entrepreneurship you see in the US. An example of this, Japanese companies have a stamp called the hanko, when a paper memo is circulated around the office each employee stamps it with their personal hanko stamp to signify that they have read it. Many Japanese companies stayed in person during COVID simply because there was no digital equivalent to the hanko and managers refused to give it up.

    If you wants an example, look at Toyota Motors. It’s been obvious to everyone with eyes that electric vehicles are the future, and it has been obvious for probably 8 or 10 years. Every major automaker is investing in EV technology. Except Toyota, which up until recently was still betting the farm on hybrids and hydrogen. But that’s because the good Mr Toyoda didn’t like EVs, and unlike in an American company no one would dare challenge him on that.

    It is really too bad. Japan is a wonderful place with an amazing culture and rich history. But if they are going to survive they need to make very serious changes to their society and they need to do it soon. That is going to involve dumping most of what currently qualifies as Japanese business culture, an instituting some real work-life balance laws with teeth. I don’t know if they’re going to do it.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      This is a good summary, but I think it misses another big point. The country is super racist. They don’t allow enough immigration to offset demographic issues. They also don’t get any other benefits of immigration like cultural changes that could actually help companies be more adaptable, or maybe trying something different than the exact same thing for 100 years is a good idea.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        The problem isn’t capitalism. US has always had capitalism and once we put good protections in it worked great, like post WWII up until like 1990ish. That golden arrow was mainly because there were strong protections for workers that were relevant to the time. A man working minimum wage could live decently and feed his family.

        The three factors of production are land, labor, and capital. All three are supposed to have equal seats at the table. But starting somewhere between the Reagan years and 1990s, we started to let capital run the table. Labor took a back seat. And what we have now is the result.

        Housing and health care became investments rather than services. Minimum wage didn’t track inflation, didn’t track CPI, and sure as hell didn’t track worker productivity. The federal minimum wage has less buying power today than at any point since the minimum wage was implemented. And there is a very real trickle down effect, in that if the lowest worker is making $7.25, all other wages adjust based on that. IE, the slightly higher end worker makes $15 or $20 because that’s double or triple the minimum wage. If the lowest worker was making $20, the slightly higher end worker would be making $40 or $60.

        The result is that the American people have less buying power at their disposal than they have in a very long time. Significantly less than during those golden years of the latter 1900s. And that is why shit sucks.

        Capitalism is not the problem. Unchecked unregulated capitalism is the problem. Regulatory capture is part of that problem. And that’s what we have now in many industries.

        Fix that, raise the minimum wage, and stop letting corporations exploit not just workers but the nation as a whole. Then you have some capitalism that works for everybody.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Economics Explained has an interesting video on the topic. After WWII, Japan became the first country in Asia to undergo an industrial revolution and soon became the second largest economy after the US and was by many accounts set to match or even overtake the US. They then suffered an economic collapse due to unchecked growth and speculative markets and decided to never again speculate on the future and just stick to tried and true methods.

    Since the 1990s, Japan’s economy has barely changed while other nations have seen huge growth. You’d assume that would mean Japan is now far behind, but they aren’t. They seem to have mastered keeping everything the same for decades without the normal decline that comes with it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      After WWII, Japan became the first country in Asia to undergo an industrial revolution

      After WW2? Industrialization during the 20s/30s was the whole reason they attempted to conqueror the Oceanic island states and the Chinese/Korean/Indochinese mainland.

      They then suffered an economic collapse due to unchecked growth and speculative markets and decided to never again speculate on the future and just stick to tried and true methods.

      The Japanese Economy was undone by The Plaza Accord and The Louvre Accord, which western nations used to devalue their currency and undermine Japanese export prices. The downturn, followed by a financialized corporate consolidation and expropriation of revenues through foreign investment, permanently crippled the Japanese economy in the aftermath of the 90s Asian recession.

      What sets countries like Japan, Korea, and the Philippines apart from China is the domestic control of their industries. Their markets are dominated by private equity and fixated on steady profit margins rather than long term public investments. Consequently, the capital cities are flooded with cash and industrial development while the rural areas are devoid of commerce. There’s no shortage of speculation, but its rooted in the private equity markets and focused largely on fictitious capital - debt instruments and their derivatives - rather than real capital or technology.

      Chinese investment in the periphery and its rising tide of middle class wage earners is what propels them into the 21st century. They’re the ones building out new transit lines, new public housing projects, new universities, and blue sky research. The Xi Government is openly hostile to speculative investment, doesn’t bother to bail out failing financial institutions, and focuses primarily on expansion of utilities, trade corridors, and mixed us developments.