edit reply: sorry, it’s a tactic for arguing. when somebody has a wide variety of dissections of what you said are making multiple interpretations simultaneously, you’re supposed to walk past them and choose the one you can win. gamergate didn’t have anything to do with this, I was just being shitty. other than being a place and time when a lot of trashy argument tactics were adapted to the online space.
edit reply: sorry, it’s a tactic for arguing. when somebody has a wide variety of dissections of what you said are making multiple interpretations simultaneously, you’re supposed to walk past them and choose the one you can win. gamergate didn’t have anything to do with this, I was just being shitty. other than being a place and time when a lot of trashy argument tactics were adapted to the online space.