• logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Tesla could solve most of their problems by firing Musk. Any other public company whose CEO makes a very public Nazi salute would fire that CEO.

    Yes, he’d still be a large shareholder, but I think simply getting him out of the company would give a lot of people the sense that he faced some personal consequences for his actions, and that any companies who deal with Musk will also face consequences.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Tesla could solve most of their problems by firing Musk.

      They could have done this a LONG time ago… now the damage is done. Nobody would care he is no longer CEO (although that may help Tesla develop better cars), people are not going to want to drive a Swasticar anyway nor give money to a literal Nazi

      Short of selling all his stock and completely disappearing from the public eye, Musk completely destroyed Tesla. There are simply better options that do not include helping/associating with a Nazi

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        The companies board and senior leadership are his family and loyalists, therefore the company is fascist and should be destroyed, regardless of Space Karens involvement.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Yes, he’d still be a large shareholder

      If they fire him, he would sell. This would tank the stock value.

      They’re damned if they do and damned if they don’t.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        His family members and deep associates are on the board, they voted to pay him $55 billion. They’re all corrupt.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Yes, he’d still be a large shareholder, but I think simply getting him out of the company would give a lot of people the sense that he faced some personal consequences for his actions

      On one hand, that might indeed satisfy a lot of the public. On the other hand, we ought to consider that a bad outcome because the real goal should be to tank TSLA to the point that Musk’s holdings no longer suffice as collateral and he’s forced to sell Xitter.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        He would need to get rid of his stock before I even consider buying from any of his companies’ products.

        Not getting starlink for my van. I guess I’ll have to stick close to cell towers on work days.

    • Ashenlux@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I think him being the shareholder is the problem. I don’t care if we was to step down as CEO, I want to see him hurt financially. Especially since he bought twitter off his Tesla stocks. Hit his stock hard enough and when it comes time to pay for twitter, he’ll be fucked.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        You’re right, but I suspect most people wouldn’t see it that way with regards to Tesla. Depending on the terms of his current compensation package, I suspect it would be better for him financially if he just stepped down and held onto the stock.

        But he’s such a narcissist that he’d never do that.