• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    We’re getting vertical streams before 21:9 aspect ratio support. Come on

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ultrawide is extremely niche compare to vertical resolutions/aspect ratio. It’s not even close.

        • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          I mean across all display devices, not just monitors.

          Dont get me wrong, while I don’t have an ultrawide, I’ve seen some of them in store and they look wonderful. It’s almost like being in the future.

          That being said, it’s clear that vertical resolutions/aspect ratios are far more widespread.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I understand that the overwhelming majority of people will still continue streaming at 16:9, or the vertical equivalent. It’s not just about ownership of ultrawide displays. It’s about support for such output format, for people who do want it. But even going by your own example, a ton of phones are 19.5:9, with some models straight up being 21:9

    • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      Getting vertical video before modern codecs (AV1∨HEVC), and the same bitrate limitations since it was justin.tv.

      It’s impressive how stagnant Twitch is, and how expensive it’s purported to be.