• Uruanna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s weird how your first thought is “the PhD is wrong” and not “I must have misunderstood something” .

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        “I must have misunderstood something” .

        There was a reason I made that comment

        Though I disagree with the conservative genitalia = gender ideology

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Or the thought the phd must have meant something else

            But sure the phd is wrong if he meant that; just like those anti-vax doctors and anti-abortion doctors

            • Uruanna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              It’s crazy how you’re still insisting that “the PhD is wrong if he meant that”’ rather than figure out that no, what you think they meant is not what they meant, it is not what they said, you are the one misunderstanding what they said. It has to be the PhD’s fault, certainly not yours.

              • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 hours ago

                It’s crazy that you think me saying “if they meant that they are wrong” means I am not open for further clarification

                • Uruanna@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  And yet, when someone explained to you what the PhD said and meant, your response was:

                  So not what the phd claims

                  And just now you were still comparing them to anti-vaxx doctors “if they meant that”, when they clearly didn’t mean that, and you were already told what they meant. You’re still pretending that maybe they said something wrong. They didn’t.

                  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    they clearly didn’t mean that, and you were already told what they meant.

                    Which one is it? Is it they clearly didn’t mean what that person said or is it they meant what that person said

    • Sibshops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think you may have misread. The PHD isn’t saying that XY becomes XX, they are saying, genetically, a person carrying XY can be a cis woman. Biologically, XY doesn’t determine the sex.