• NotLemming@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    No taxes but an egg is $100 and a loaf of bread is $1000. All hail magnificent leader but how many wheelbarrows full of money do I need to pay for my weekly groceries? Or is he making a new orange $1000 bill with his face on it?

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    So, everyone earning less than 150k will have no taxes and everyone earning more than 150k will have no taxes. Who the fuck will be paying taxes?

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    To be clear, the TCJA adds 4.5 Trillion in deficit. The Trump admin promises but has utterly failed to come close to cutting 2 Trillion in deficit by dismantling government systems and services.

    Unless they magically conjure 2.5 Trillion dollars from thin air without borrowing a single dollar from the Treasury, the budget will never be balanced. That is the plan.

  • 467265654C75696769@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Right after he drops the major greatest and bestest healthcare plan called “Obamacare Replacement”, everyone is saying the healthcare plan is the universally humongous and very very super nice.

  • 𝔗𝔢𝔯 𝔐𝔞𝔵𝔦𝔪𝔞@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a leftist, if he were to actually do this, it generally seems like a good idea to me. (Although 150K is probably too high)

    Disregarding the rest of his policies, are there any leftist arguments why this particular measure would be a bad idea ?

    (Please respond politely. This doesn’t mean I like Trump, I still think he’s evil and stupid. But even Hitler himself had at least one good idea : being vegetarian.)

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Setting aside the fact that he’s lying

      You’d have to make up the lost tax revenue from somewhere. Either by increasing or creating some other tax, or by cutting spending.

      The programs that would be likely to be cut are ones that poor people need. And he’s likely to try and throw down a federal sales tax, which loads a higher tax burden on poor people.

      Without those details, “eliminating federal income tax for people making under $X” cannot be qualified as good or bad. You must define the other parts of the equation.