VAN BUREN COUNTY, Mich. – Michigan State Police say that legalization >of marijuana is making their jobs difficult.
Officers say that they are able to smell marijuana at traffic stops but are not clear on how law enforcement should handle each situation.
Police are struggling to address reports they receive due to the legality of the substance.
“We come across a lot of kids that are under 21 that have possession of it and obviously that’s in violation so we seize it and go through the process that way but when we come across people that are 21 and older and actually have it legally that’s where it’s kind of hard to deal with it in that aspect," Michigan State Officer Andrew Jeffrey said.
Officer Jeffrey says police receive multiple reports of people smoking marijuana but police cannot do anything if they obtained the substance legally and are not underage.
Marijuana is a short-cut that police have been abusing for years to justify illegal searches of cars. That is what they’re really up in arms about.
Unlike many drugs, marijuana has a very pungent and distinctive odor to it. An officer can’t justify a search by lying and claiming to smell cocaine. Where marijuana is illegal, police can search any vehicle or person they want simply by lying and saying they smell marijuana. Even if the search turns up nothing, that does not make the search invalid. The officer can simply claim they were mistaken. The barrier to justifying a search is rather low. It’s impossible to prove the officer is lying. You can’t prove they didn’t smell marijuana. Marijuana is a tool that cops can use to flagrantly violate the 4th Amendment.
This is the real reason police oppose marijuana legalization.
That half page of text is literally the whole article, quoting a single police referencing traffic stops like they imply legalized weed is causing more dangerous driving and traffic stops where they can’t seize property anymore without linking the possession of medicine to an effect on their driving. There’s no study that shows a link between legalizing cannabis and increased vehicle accidents or fatalities. The article reads like it was written as cop public relations with an alcohol trade group lobbyist looking over their shoulder.
They ignore the position that drug abuse is a medical issue not a legal issue, and all drugs should be legalized for both the safety of the users and the community because it reduces violent crime and dangerous, unregulated black markets.
Maybe they’re saying that they’re unsure how to handle potential DUI? Honestly, this article is so poorly written that we can’t tell whether they’re being whiny or making a legitimate point.
In the UK it’s illegal to have more than 2 micrograms of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol per liter of blood whilst driving. They test at the road side and then do a blood test if that’s positive just like they would for alcohol.
I got curious. Here’s the actual story:
Marijuana is a short-cut that police have been abusing for years to justify illegal searches of cars. That is what they’re really up in arms about.
Unlike many drugs, marijuana has a very pungent and distinctive odor to it. An officer can’t justify a search by lying and claiming to smell cocaine. Where marijuana is illegal, police can search any vehicle or person they want simply by lying and saying they smell marijuana. Even if the search turns up nothing, that does not make the search invalid. The officer can simply claim they were mistaken. The barrier to justifying a search is rather low. It’s impossible to prove the officer is lying. You can’t prove they didn’t smell marijuana. Marijuana is a tool that cops can use to flagrantly violate the 4th Amendment.
This is the real reason police oppose marijuana legalization.
Link to the article: https://www.abc57.com/news/michigan-police-claim-marijuana-legalization-has-made-work-difficult
That half page of text is literally the whole article, quoting a single police referencing traffic stops like they imply legalized weed is causing more dangerous driving and traffic stops where they can’t seize property anymore without linking the possession of medicine to an effect on their driving. There’s no study that shows a link between legalizing cannabis and increased vehicle accidents or fatalities. The article reads like it was written as cop public relations with an alcohol trade group lobbyist looking over their shoulder.
They ignore the position that drug abuse is a medical issue not a legal issue, and all drugs should be legalized for both the safety of the users and the community because it reduces violent crime and dangerous, unregulated black markets.
That’s because it probably was just a press release that was made into an article, which is frustratingly common.
What’s difficult about how to handle the situation of, “it’s not illegal, do nothing”?
Maybe they’re saying that they’re unsure how to handle potential DUI? Honestly, this article is so poorly written that we can’t tell whether they’re being whiny or making a legitimate point.
In the UK it’s illegal to have more than 2 micrograms of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol per liter of blood whilst driving. They test at the road side and then do a blood test if that’s positive just like they would for alcohol.
They need a device like a blood glucose tester. Thc only stays in your blood for a few hours.