• alkbch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You don’t get to decide who uses what product and commit vandalism acts if they choose differently than you.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You would be attacking Musk. The users of the product get compensated. In fact, an insurance write off is a better financial option than the second hand market.

      • alkbch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No, you wouldn’t be attacking Musk, you are attacking random people.

        If you want to attack Musk, then target his own properties, not random people’s; not that I condone violence either way.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          People are attacking Teslas future income stream.

          That means they are attacking the current Tesla share price.

          That means they are attacking Musk.

          Normal people are compensated by insurance.

          Future tesla owners will need to pay higher insurance premiums.

          • alkbch@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            You know people can attack Tesla’s future income stream simply by not buying a Tesla.

            There’s no need to destroy random citizens private property and we already established they are not made whole by insurance.

            It is naive to think insurance prices will only rise for future Tesla owners.

            If I disagree with something you do, that does not justify me destroying your private property.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              You know people can attack Tesla’s future income stream simply by not buying a Tesla.

              And you can attack it even more by dissuading other people too.

              There’s no need to destroy random citizens private property

              There is a need if faster results are sought.

              and we already established they are not made whole by insurance.

              Then sell before it’s vandalised.

              is naive to think insurance prices will only rise for future Tesla owners.

              This is how insurance works. Brands, models and even colors have different premiums.

              If I disagree with something you do, that does not justify me destroying your private property.

              It’s not about the Tesla owner directly. It’s about damaging Musk.

              I should state that I am not going to damage anyone’s private property, but current and future Tesla owners should be aware of the logic behind the attacks and act appropriately.