My impression is that contrary to the headline, this isn’t a young vs old thing, but a follows-the-news vs doesn’t-follow-news thing
My impression is that contrary to the headline, this isn’t a young vs old thing, but a follows-the-news vs doesn’t-follow-news thing
That seems to only be AOCs opinion of the contents of the CR. Not what’s in it.
Are you a lawyer and or elected official? Have you read the bill? What is your opinion on the contents of the CR?
Im not a lawyer or elected official. No one on Lemmy is. Including you. So I refer to the official I did elect to represent me. It’s their job to read the bills and act on them in my interest. AOC is doing exactly that.
You’re free to read the bill at any time. It’s available online. I’m not your staff secretary. If you want the nitty gritties you need to do it yourself.
I can downvote them now after this though right? After it’s been made painfully clear that at best they are a sea lion?
Are you asking permission to vote a certain way? I don’t understand.
You made an edit in the comment before that telling us we shouldn’t downvote him. You don’t remember that?
I added to the comment in my edit.
What exactly is your point?
You edited your comment to me. Don’t you remember that?
I also edited this comment to correct spelling errors. So again, what’s your point? I’m confused.
Well now my point is you might be an asshole.
I have no idea what you’ve been trying to talk about this entire time. So… Ok, sure. Call me an asshole instead of elaborating. Thumbs up.
You made edit to your comment in which you admonished people for downvoting that other poster. Then in his response to your comment he made it very clear that he was being disingenuous and a sea lion at best. I was commenting that now is it okay if we downvote him. I don’t understand what you’re not getting this is not complicated. I made a tongue-in-cheek remark to your remark. You met that remark with hostility for no reason. You’re an extremely unpleasant person.