The biblical jesus didn’t exist. There’s evidence that a Jesus existed, and was notable enough to piss off the Roman administration.
A lot of the biblical stories are older than jesus however, so he has a lot of existing “lore” tacked on to him. He was likely a nomadic wise/holy man who built up a bit of a following and was then crucified.
there’s one mention of a jesus that fits, in roman records. one time, one person, wrote a name down.
could that be a real person or maybe a story about a person?
not just biblical stories predated jesus, but the entire story is exactly the same as Zoroaster.
from the exact same region, exact same people, “first recorded in the mid-6th century BCE”.
some people just made a reboot of Zoroastrianism… probably the romans, on purpose, to make their combo-religion to govern all romans (catholicism)
jesus did not exist at all
The biblical jesus didn’t exist. There’s evidence that a Jesus existed, and was notable enough to piss off the Roman administration.
A lot of the biblical stories are older than jesus however, so he has a lot of existing “lore” tacked on to him. He was likely a nomadic wise/holy man who built up a bit of a following and was then crucified.
there’s one mention of a jesus that fits, in roman records. one time, one person, wrote a name down.
could that be a real person or maybe a story about a person?
not just biblical stories predated jesus, but the entire story is exactly the same as Zoroaster.
from the exact same region, exact same people, “first recorded in the mid-6th century BCE”.
some people just made a reboot of Zoroastrianism… probably the romans, on purpose, to make their combo-religion to govern all romans (catholicism)
jesus did not exist at all