cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square182fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1118arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square182fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-23 days agoIt is because a human artist is usually inspired and uses knowledge to create new art and AI is just a mediocre mimic. A human artist doesn’t accidentally put six fingers on people on a regular basis. If they put fewer fingers it is intentional.
minus-squaremimavox@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoThat’s where I don’t agree. I don’t subscribe to the view that LLMs merely are “stochastic parrots”.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoWhat do you think they are if not that? They don’t have emotions, they don’t have individual motivations, and don’t have intent.
It is because a human artist is usually inspired and uses knowledge to create new art and AI is just a mediocre mimic. A human artist doesn’t accidentally put six fingers on people on a regular basis. If they put fewer fingers it is intentional.
That’s where I don’t agree. I don’t subscribe to the view that LLMs merely are “stochastic parrots”.
What do you think they are if not that?
They don’t have emotions, they don’t have individual motivations, and don’t have intent.