What are some things that just get under your skin about games?

For me, it’s games that do not allow controller rebinding. I have neuropathy and my fingers don’t all work. If I can’t rebind buttons so that I have necessary moves (for example: parry) be on buttons I can reliably press the entire game becomes unplayable.

And on console, where I can’t refund a game after I downloaded it (fuck you Sony) then it really screws me over wasting what limited funds I have on games I just can’t play.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Photo modes that limit camera movement to within a tiny radius of the player character. FF7 Remake/Rebirth, and FF16, are glaring examples of this.

    Or photo modes that fade out NPCs or objects when the camera gets close enough for good screenshots of them.

    Just give me a boundless flying camera option and let me live with the unfinished bits if I so choose.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Oooh these are good pet peeves. Photo modes can be hit or miss.

      I love the ones in the Spoderman games. Got some amazing screenshots from all 3

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Obligatory tutorials. Make it a choice.

    QTE “final bosses”. Seemed to be a much bigger problem in the PS3/360 era.

    “Open world” or “Sandbox” games that don’t care about your progress, where it’s painfully obvious that your actions don’t matter at all. Yes, this is mostly about Starfield

    Games where you can win by a landslide but the computer/story goes “Hah, you were just lucky!”

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Definitely with you on controller rebinding! Now that I’m an old man I also absolutely hate how damn tiny the text is when playing games on a TV. Gamers are getting old, we don’t all have young eyes or sit in front of a monitor to play games!

  • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Cutscenes that can’t be paused, especially if they’re longer than 10 seconds.

    Do you have the slightest idea how frustrating it is to be mid-cutscene, something else requires my attention, and I cannot fucking pause it? Singlehandedly my biggest gripe with gaming.

    • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, when the start button instead just skips the cutscene with no additional prompt? Extremely annoying!

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same with unskippable cutscenes, especially before a difficult boss. It’s no fun to have to sit through it over and over if I’m struggling with said boss, or have to sit through a cutscene I’ve seen several times in previous playthroughs. This also applies to the game’s credits.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m always afraid to test ESC during a cutscene because I’ve been burned by games that auto skip cutscenes when you hit ESC. Who does that.

  • Don_alForno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Anything that needlessly makes me repeat content I already beat or similarly wastes my time. Some examples are:

    Fixed save points in general.

    Unskippable cutscenes between the last fixed save point and the boss fight.

    No autosave or fixed save point after a boss fight.

    Preventing me from backtracking after I stumbled into a cut scene and/or boss fight because it wasn’t obvious which path led to a point of no return.

    Oh, and no Play Station style controller glyphs. Come on, it’s an additional set of images, now hard can it be to implement?

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fixed save points in general.

      To be fair, non-fixed savepoints introduce a bunch of additional work, especially on the gameplay design and testing sides, and for some games that work is better invested into other aspects of the game.

      But if savepoints are fixed, they have to be frequent enough to not become an issue.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Any time I realize the optimal path is really boring or tedious.

    Like, imagine you could sell junk to vendors for money, but for some reason you get more money if you sell them one at a time. Spending five minutes splitting inventory stacks sucks, but it’s 30% more gold and that’s the difference between the cool sword or the basic sword.

    A made up example, but hopefully gets the point across.

    Related: long travel times with nothing interesting or challenging happening. I remember playing some shitty MMO and you had to like run through a building, go up an elevator, and down a long hallway every time you wanted to learn skills. Just five minutes of nothing. Gotta juice those playtime stats, I guess.

    It’s different if there’s stuff to do en route. Monsters to fight or whatever. But when it’s just jogging? Very disappointing.

  • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    3D level design where you can get stuck on elements when you just want to move past them. Especially frustrating in racing games or sections where you have to move fast. Controls are just not precise enough to deal with this under stress.

    Visible polygons and interactable polygons are not the same thing. Play Banjo Kazooie and Yookah Laylee (including the remake) to see the difference. The latter has you constantly bump into things because the environment is not smoothed out.

    On the other hand some studios take it to the other extreme and make you walk almost on rails, childproofing every corner. A good middle ground is needed.

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Games you can’t pause. I love Dark Souls, but PLEASE give me a real pause button !

    I’m okay with the inventory not pausing, that’s part of the game design. I’m not okay with the fact I can’t pause at all, so if my neighbour rings for their spare key when I’m fighting Kalameet I just have to die 🤷🏻‍♀ (true story btw)

  • flamiera@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I have two.

    1. The Culture

    I do not claim to be a ‘gamer’. I prefer to be best described as someone who plays games, but not nearly as often as one branded a ‘gamer’ would play games by. But I’ve been partly turned off from video games because of the culture surrounding them. The streamers who play games, the RGB droolers, the tech-junkies, the whales, the hype-train types, the multi-hour essay level of delivering an opinion on a game .etc

    Not to mention, all of the gamer-branded merchandise from chairs to even drinks. It just turns me off and I do not ever associate with that crowd and it’s a damn shame there is so much gullibility with the culture that it is difficult to avoid.

    1. Game-Padding

    Side-quest after side-quest does a game not make. That kind of thing is what you’d find in an MMO that needs to find things for you to do. Not in a more constrained container of a game that has a fixed story, a fixed completion rate and everything. All it tells me is that the developers did not think of or have had any faith in what they were making.

  • Devial@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Games that don’t allow you to pause and skip cutscenes.

    I don’t want to have to miss half of the cutscenes just because someone interrupted me or the phone rang or something half way through. Alternatively, when I’m on my 23rd replay of a game, I do not want to have to sit through every cutscenes I already know by heart.

    Oh, and modern games that allow manual saving at any time, not having any kind of regular auto save (looking at you here BG3).

    If you’re fine from a gameplay pov with having the player save whenever, then there’s really no good reason whatsoever to not have one or two auto save slots that get saved every 10-20 minutes or so, at least as an option in the menu. ESPECIALLY in open world games (like BG3…) where you can easily go literal hours at a time without hitting a checkpoint save. And yes, I am still salty over learning about BG3’s lack of regular auto save when I lost like 2.5 hours of progress on my first run.

    • demonsword@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Games that don’t allow you to pause and skip cutscenes.

      This is the main reason I cannot replay Valkyrie Profile

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I do not want to have to sit through every cutscenes I already know by heart.

      Forget it, there’s no way you’re taking Kairi’s heart!

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Alright, I’ll limit it to just pet peeves.

    Tutorial sections that just suck. Some don’t explain enough, others treat you like you’ve never played a game in your life. Or, when they interrupt you to explain a mechanic in great detail, but it’s too much of an info dump, and you’re just left wondering wtf they just said. One game that I really liked how they did it was BG3. There’s a tutorial, but you can also turn it off on future runs. Worst tutorial I think I’ve ever seen was Xenoblade 2.

    Games (and really any consumable media) that just don’t know when to end. There are very few games I’ve completed, mostly because I get bored. The game overstayed it’s welcome and I’m done. The grind isn’t worth the final boss fight or whatever is at the end. Generally, it’s because games (especially RPGs) think grinding is a “fun” mechanic when it’s more of an imbalanced game. Take, for example, Expedition 33, not once in that game do you need to run around grinding levels. You can successfully go through the entire game, only going to each stage once. Fucking fantastic. But then you have games that just went too far with things. Some games, like Skyrim, CP2077, (especially) Hogwarts Legacy, I only know the ending to those games because other people beat them. Ex33 I got 52/55 achievements (just need to win the gestral games and find whatever record I missed). I beat that game entirely in 74 hours. My first run of BG3 (53/54 achievements, only missing the bard one, because I think it’s boring), first playthrough was maybe 120 hours (currently over 700 due to multiple playthroughs). Skyrim… 146 hours… 27/75 achievements. CP2077, 133 hours, 18/57 achievements. Hogwarts sits at 50 hours with 19/45 achievements (that game should be a 20-hour game at most).

    Games that don’t really respect your time. This one, Nintendo does a lot. Actually perfect example is Breath of the Wild. It’s a giant fuck off world that’s mostly empty, peppered largely with the same enemies throughout the whole thing. You have a weapon mechanic that encourages you NOT to fight (just get some good weapons and head off to exactly where you need to go). The cooking is bullshit, no recipe book, no making a bunch of something, a stupid cutscene every time. And the entire poop joke… like getting 20 for a poop joke would already be too much, but collecting 900 with (IIRC) no fucking way to track them… Or the fact that the way Nintendo expects you to get arrows is to grind out rupees to buy them. And the exploits used to get arrows or rupees quickly, in a single player game, they actively tried to patch out. That’s just one game, Nintendo does this on SO MANY GAMES, which actually pushed me to “fuck Nintendo” and I didn’t buy and won’t buy a Switch 2.

    Some games are combos of these. One game I really like, but I always hit a wall is Satisfactory. Once I get to trains/aluminum, it’s just not fun anymore for me. I work 40-80 hours a week (sometimes I work 5x12s and 8ish hours Sat/Sun)(only sometimes, usually closer to 50 hours a week)… so all the extra planning and time to making a factory… like I just don’t have the fucking time. Same thing with Dune Awakening. The first zone was the best. Getting your first Orni wasn’t too bad, but it was already starting to push it. Having to fucking pay taxes in a game… Oddly, it was about the time I was farming up aluminum, I quit that game too. Maybe I have a pet peeve with aluminum in video games…

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tutorial sections that just suck. Some don’t explain enough, others treat you like you’ve never played a game in your life. Or, when they interrupt you to explain a mechanic in great detail, but it’s too much of an info dump, and you’re just left wondering wtf they just said.

      The ones I hate the most are the ones that meticulously teach you “press A to jump!” (Cool thanks, yeah, I’ve been playing video games since Super Mario Bros, I’m pretty good on the basics) but then you get out of the tutorial and play for an hour or two and realize that you’ve never once had to jump, but that complicated combo that they didn’t even allude to in the tutorial is for some reason the core game mechanic.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Games (and really any consumable media) that just don’t know when to end.

      Watched a gameranx video the other day about this. It’s the lack of closure. Players need that catharsis and pay off for all their efforts or else it inevitably starts to feel pointless rather than fun.

      Even MMO’s had a closure for their main story arcs and you played the end game content. The new Live Service model though doesn’t like that cause it means they can’t milk it for eternity. They’d have to keep making new stories and actual game content but that is time consuming and meticulous for creative industries. You can’t pump it out like you can cosmetics and battle passes.

      It’s honestly a huge issue in the industry. The gameranx video goes much deeper into the topic.

      Edit: I should have finished reading before I posted this. Now I look dumb for jumping the gun

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Actually, what you said unlocked a memory. Though I don’t know if it falls in line with the Gameranx video (I’ll have to go watch that) or your sentiment. But the ‘Players need that catharsis and pay off for all their efforts or else it inevitably starts to feel pointless rather than fun.’ immediately made me think of the first Shadow of Mordor game. It was a great game, undone by a QTE final boss.

        But yeah, so many of these games just don’t go anywhere. To your point, the live service games. It’s not 100% with what I intended, but I feel it ends up in the same area… I’m spending all these hours… what am I accomplishing? What’s the point of all of this? It’s just endless padding with endless travel time, side quests, and anything that requires you to wait real time for the quest to progress. Dailies in WoW, were my WoW killer. Some people saw it as “easy gold”; I saw it as non-content meant to drive daily engagement but not actually accomplish anything in the game. It’s all just padding for extra “engagement” or to make a game seem bigger than it is (or should be).

        I’ll break down some of the issues I had with the games I listed for better context. And I’ll front this with, I know you don’t have to do side missions. It’s more like, you realise instead of giving you a tight, compact story that’s well crafted, they spent too much time padding it out so it appears to be a bigger game. CP2077, the main story is absolutely dwarfed by all the side content. The main quest line is like… ~35 missions? There are like 70+ “gigs” and the same for “side missions”. The main story is the thing you do the least. With missing mechanics, I can’t help but think it would have been more interesting if it were done in a more linear fashion like Deus Ex Human Revolution. Instead of a giant city that’s mostly empty boxes (the buildings aren’t buildings) and padded out with side quests. Skyrim, the thing that killed it for me, was just how pathetically easy it was to become the leader of the various groups/factions. It felt so unearned. I can only take being handed “wins” left and right because I’m the fucking chosen one… before it’s just dull. It was Medieval Idiocracy. I could have just started learning spells and they’re ready to give me the college because I’m the smartest person they’ve ever seen. Brawndo, it’s what Dragonborns crave. And Hogwarts, walking around the castle, was the best part. It felt magical and alive. Some of the puzzles were fun. But the classes were boring tutorial sections, and the main thing you do in the game is LEAVE Hogwarts to go do unspeakable things in non-descript burrows and dungeons scattered all over the place. That game has 15 main quests, 21 side quests. 95 Merlin Trials…

        The tl;dr: An easy way to look at it, CP2077, Hogwarts, and Expedition 33 have similar playtime for just the main quest (per howlongtobeat.com, ~26-28 hours). But how it feels to play the game is drastically different. One had a story to tell and a point to get to, and it does that. The others made a world with a whole bunch of other stuff to do.

  • Infrapink@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    2 days ago

    Needing to log into an online account to play a single-player game.

    When a single-player game keeps pausing to tell me it can’t connect to the server.

    • Lojcs@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Especially when this happens in small indie games.

      You were the chosen one Anakin!