A train track between the Polish cities of Warsaw and Lublin was destroyed in an “unprecedented act of sabotage” over the weekend, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Monday, noting that the railway is “crucially important for delivering aid to Ukraine.”
A friendly reminder that 1.5% of Nato countries’ GDP will be earmarked for security measures that are considered ‘non-military’ - e.g., such sabotage acts and similar crimes like arson attacks, cyber attacks, and things like that.
A friendly reminder that 1.5% of Nato countries’ GDP will be earmarked for security measures that are considered ‘non-military’ - e.g., such sabotage acts and similar crimes like arson attacks, cyber attacks, and things like that.
As in “defense against sabotage” or for a COMMITTING sabotage?
Or maybe neither, just repairing damage?
A rhetoric question?
As the scale of Russian sabotage operations against Europe’s critical infrastructure are on the rise - e.g., by hiring criminals in Europe to carry out attacks -, as well as China’s digital aggression on Europe expanding, … there is ample evidence for a rising threat landscape and Europe must act upon it.
No, just clarifying (mostly for fun). 1.5% GDP for sabotage is fun to interpret as a budget for COMMITTING it.